A World Liberty wallet reportedly borrowed $75 million in stablecoins against $WLFI tokens and later sent more than $40 million to Coinbase Prime.
DeFi analysts warned that the $WLFI-backed position o...

<div><div>
<p/>
<ul>
<li><strong>A World Liberty wallet reportedly borrowed $75 million in stablecoins against <span>$WLFI</span> tokens and later sent more than $40 million to Coinbase Prime.</strong></li>
<li><strong>DeFi analysts warned that the <span>$WLFI</span>-backed position on Dolomite could become difficult to liquidate cleanly if the token price falls.</strong></li>
</ul>
<hr/>
<p>A large borrowing position tied to World Liberty is drawing fresh scrutiny after onchain observers flagged both its size and its timing.</p>
<adv/><adv/><p>According to the details circulating among DeFi researchers, a wallet linked to World Liberty used <span>$WLFI</span> tokens as collateral to borrow $75 million in USD1 and USDC on Dolomite. More than $40 million of that was then reportedly transferred to Coinbase Prime, with the movement said to have occurred just hours before Donald Trump’s announcement of a U.S.-Iran ceasefire.</p>
<h2>A large collateral position starts to worry lenders</h2>
<p>The immediate concern is not simply that the borrowing was big. It is that the collateral behind it may be hard to unwind if markets move the wrong way.</p>
<p>Analysts on X argued that the position creates an elevated risk of bad debt for other lenders on Dolomite, particularly if <span>$WLFI</span> falls toward liquidation levels. That is where the structure starts to look fragile. A collateral asset can be marked at a high valuation on paper, but if real market liquidity is thin, liquidation becomes more theory than mechanism.</p>
<p>One researcher, posting under the name EthanDeFi, <span>said the</span> position was effectively “unliquidatable” near stress levels without causing meaningful losses for lenders. The point there is fairly simple. If too much collateral must be sold into too little demand, the protocol may not recover enough value fast enough to protect everyone upstream.</p>
<h2>The deeper issue is liquidity, not headline valuation</h2>
<p>That distinction matters because <span>$WLFI</span>’s reported fully diluted valuation may look large, around $10 billion by the figures cited in the discussion, while actual market depth appears much smaller. In DeFi, that gap can be dangerous.</p>
<p>It means a token may support aggressive borrowing in calm conditions, yet fail badly as collateral during stress.</p>
<p>The Coinbase Prime transfer has also sharpened attention because of its reported timing. Even without drawing conclusions from that alone, the sequence has made lenders more sensitive to counterparty risk around the position. For users with stablecoins lent into Dolomite pools accepting <span>$WLFI</span> collateral, the debate has shifted quickly from yield to recoverability.</p>

</div></div>

WLFI Borrowing Raises Fresh Risk Questions After $40M Coinbase Prime Transfer

据报道，一个 World Liberty 钱包以 $WLFI 代币为抵押，借入了价值 7500 万美元的稳定币，随后将超过 4000 万美元转入 Coinbase Prime。

DeFi 分析师警告称，由 $WLFI 支持的头寸……

<div><div><p/><ul><li><strong>据报道，World Liberty 的一个钱包以<span>$WLFI</span>代币为抵押借入了价值 7500 万美元的稳定币，随后又向 Coinbase Prime 发送了超过 4000 万美元。</strong></li><li> <strong>DeFi 分析师警告称，如果代币价格下跌，<span>由 $WLFI</span>支持的 Dolomite 头寸可能难以干净地清算。</strong></li></ul><hr/><p>与 World Liberty 相关的巨额借款头寸在链上观察人士指出其规模和时机后，正受到新的关注。</p><adv/><adv/><p>根据DeFi研究人员中流传的消息，一个与World Liberty关联的钱包使用<span>$WLFI</span>代币作为抵押品，在Dolomite平台上借入了7500万美元的美元1元和USDC 。据报道，其中超过4000万美元随后被转移到了Coinbase Prime，而这笔资金的转移据称发生在唐纳德·特朗普宣布美伊停火前几个小时。</p><h2>大量抵押品开始让贷款方感到担忧</h2><p>眼下最令人担忧的并非借款规模巨大，而是如果市场走势不利，抵押品可能难以解除。</p><p> X 上的分析师认为，这种做法会给 Dolomite 平台上的其他贷款机构带来更高的坏账风险，尤其是在<span>$WLFI</span>跌至清算水平时。届时，该结构将开始显得脆弱。抵押资产在账面上可能估值很高，但如果实际市场流动性不足，清算就只是纸上谈兵，而非实际操作。</p><p>一位网名为EthanDeFi的研究人员发帖<span>称，在接近压力水平时，该</span>头寸实际上“无法清算”，否则将给贷款人造成重大损失。关键在于：如果必须出售过多的抵押品而需求却不足，协议可能无法在足够短的时间内收回足够的价值，从而无法保护上游各方的利益。</p><h2>更深层次的问题在于流动性，而非表面估值。</h2><p>这一区别至关重要，因为<span>WLFI</span>公布的完全稀释估值可能看起来很高，根据讨论中引用的数据约为100亿美元，而实际市场深度却要小得多。在DeFi领域，这种差距可能很危险。</p><p>这意味着，在市场环境平静的情况下，代币可能支持激进的借贷行为，但在市场压力下，代币作为抵押品可能会表现不佳。</p><p> Coinbase Prime的转账也因其报道的时间点而备受关注。即便不仅凭这一点就下结论，这一系列操作也让贷款方对该头寸的交易对手风险更加敏感。对于那些将稳定币借入接受<span>$WLFI</span>抵押品的Dolomite资金池的用户而言，讨论的焦点已迅速从收益率转向可收回性。</p></div></div>

WLFI借贷引发新的风险担忧，此前Coinbase Prime转账金额高达4000万美元。

汤姆·李的公司Bitmine Immersion Technologies最近通过场外交易（OTC）从以太坊基金会（EF）购买了10,000个以太币（ 姨太 ）。据基金会称，价格……

Tom Lee 和 BitMine 最新收购以太坊的交易遭到了社群。

Visa 和 TikTok 联合上线了Creator Card，目标是到 2027 年开拓一个价值 5000 亿镁的市场，旨在解决英国 49% 的创作者面临的现金流挑战，他们经常遭遇付款延迟。

Visa 和 TikTok 在英国上线了一款专为内容创作者设计的债务卡。

文 | 版面之外，撰文｜版君
2024年8月2日，英特尔一夜暴跌26%，股价跌回十年前，创下多年来最惨烈的单日跌幅。
三个月后，一场更具标志性的转折来临。2024年11月8日，英伟达正式取代英特尔，成为道琼斯工业平均指数的成分股。
一次指数调整，也是一次时代的宣判。GPU取代CPU，英伟达取代英特尔。这个英特尔坚守了25年的行业荣誉，最终易主，沦为它衰落最鲜明的标志。
2026年4月23日，英特尔...