A coalition including Aave, Kelp and LayerZero has asked the Arbitrum DAO to release about $71 million in frozen $ETH.
The funds would go to DeFi United, the coordinated recovery effort set up after t...

<div><div>
<p/>
<ul>
<li><strong>A coalition including Aave, Kelp and LayerZero has asked the Arbitrum DAO to release about $71 million in frozen <span>$ETH</span>.</strong></li>
<li><strong>The funds would go to DeFi United, the coordinated recovery effort set up after the $292 million Kelp DAO exploit.</strong></li>
</ul>
<hr/>
<p>The DeFi recovery effort around the Kelp DAO exploit is now moving into Arbitrum governance, where one of the biggest unresolved pools of funds remains frozen and politically difficult to touch.</p>
<adv/><adv/><p>A coalition of major protocols, including Aave, Kelp and LayerZero, filed a Constitutional AIP on the Arbitrum forum on Saturday morning seeking the release of roughly $71 million in frozen <span>$ETH</span>. If approved, the assets would be transferred into DeFi United, the cross-protocol relief effort formed in response to last week’s $292 million Kelp DAO exploit.</p>
<h2>The frozen <span>$ETH</span> has become central to the recovery math</h2>
<p>That request matters because the Arbitrum-frozen funds are no longer just a security measure. They have become a key piece of the broader recovery equation.</p>
<p>The original freeze was meant to stop the attacker from moving a portion of the stolen assets further through the system. But once those funds were immobilized, the question shifted. Should they remain locked indefinitely, or should governance now redirect them into a coordinated restitution process?</p>
<p>The coalition is clearly arguing for the second route.</p>
<p>DeFi United has emerged as the main vehicle for trying to restore the missing backing behind rsETH, which was at the center of the Kelp exploit fallout. A number of ecosystem players have already floated contributions or support mechanisms, but the frozen <span>$ETH</span> on Arbitrum is different. It is already there, already trapped, and large enough to materially affect whether the recovery package closes the gap cleanly.</p>
<h2>Arbitrum governance now faces a harder decision</h2>
<p>This is where the issue becomes less technical and more constitutional.</p>
<p>Releasing frozen funds into a recovery vehicle may look sensible from an ecosystem stability standpoint, but it also forces Arbitrum governance to set a precedent around what happens when emergency controls intersect with broader market repair. That is not a small choice for a network that has spent years trying to balance decentralization with credible crisis response.</p>
<p>For Aave, Kelp and LayerZero, the logic is fairly direct. The assets are frozen, the damage is real, and DeFi United already exists as the organizing structure for repair.</p>
<p>For Arbitrum tokenholders, the question is more delicate. Whether the network should merely freeze stolen funds or actively decide where they go next is exactly the kind of governance problem decentralized systems prefer to avoid, until they no longer can.</p>

</div></div>

Arbitrum Asked to Release $71 Million in Frozen ETH for Kelp Recovery Plan

包括Aave、Kelp 和 LayerZero 在内的联盟已要求Arbitrum DAO 释放约 7100 万美元的冻结ETH。
这些资金将捐给 DeFi United，这是在……之后设立的协调恢复计划。

<div><div><p/><ul><li><strong>包括Aave、Kelp 和 LayerZero 在内的联盟已要求Arbitrum DAO 释放约 7100 万美元的冻结<span>ETH</span> 。</strong></li><li><strong>这些资金将用于 DeFi United，这是在 Kelp DAO 遭受 2.92 亿美元攻击后成立的协调恢复组织。</strong></li></ul><hr/><p>围绕 Kelp DAO 漏洞的 DeFi 恢复工作现在正转移到Arbitrum治理层面，其中最大的未解决资金池之一仍然被冻结，并且在政治上难以触及。</p><adv/><adv/><p>包括Aave、Kelp 和 LayerZero 在内的多个主流协议联盟于周六上午在Arbitrum论坛提交了一份宪法修正案申请 (AIP)，寻求解冻约 7100 万美元被冻结的<span>ETH</span> 。如果获得批准，这些资产将被转移到 DeFi United，这是一个跨协议的救助项目，旨在应对上周 Kelp DAO 遭受的 2.92 亿美元攻击事件。</p><h2>被冻结的<span>ETH</span>已成为复苏计算的核心。</h2><p>这项请求至关重要，因为仲裁庭冻结的资金不再仅仅是一种安全措施，它们已成为更广泛的追偿方案中的关键组成部分。</p><p>最初的冻结是为了阻止攻击者将部分被盗资产进一步转移到系统中。但一旦这些资金被冻结，问题就发生了变化：它们应该无限期地被锁定，还是应该由监管机构引导它们进入一个协调一致的归还流程？</p><p>该联盟显然支持第二条路线。</p><p> DeFi United 已成为恢复 rsETH 资金缺口的主要途径，rsETH 正是 Kelp 漏洞事件的核心所在。虽然许多生态系统参与者已经提出了捐款或支持机制，但Arbitrum上冻结的<span>ETH</span>情况有所不同。这笔资金已经存在，已被冻结，而且数额巨大，足以对恢复方案能否顺利填补资金缺口产生实质性影响。</p><h2>Arbitrum的治理现在面临着更艰难的抉择。</h2><p>这就涉及到宪法问题，而不是技术问题了。</p><p>从生态系统稳定的角度来看，将冻结资金释放到恢复工具中似乎合情合理，但这同时也迫使Arbitrum 的治理层就紧急控制措施与更广泛的市场修复措施交织在一起时应采取的行动树立先例。对于一个多年来一直努力在去中心化和可靠的危机应对之间寻求平衡的网络而言，这并非一个轻松的选择。</p><p>对于Aave、Kelp 和 LayerZero 来说，逻辑相当直接。资产已被冻结，损失是实实在在的，而 DeFi United 已经存在，可以作为修复工作的组织架构。</p><p>对于Arbitrum代币持有者而言，这个问题更为棘手。网络究竟应该仅仅冻结被盗资金，还是应该主动决定这些资金的下一步去向？这正是去中心化系统通常极力避免的治理难题，直到它们再也无法回避为止。</p></div></div>

Arbitrum被要求为Kelp复苏计划解冻价值7100万美元的ETH

原创 | Odaily 星球日报（@OdailyChina）
作者｜Azuma（@Azuma_eth）
马斯克旗下商业航天巨头 SpaceX 预计将于本周五正式进行 IPO。
多家外媒此前已报道，SpaceX 计划以每股 135 美元的价格发行约 5.56 亿股新股，融资约 750 亿美元，对应公司估值约 1.75 万亿美元。若交易按计划完成，这将超过沙特阿美在 2019 年创下的纪录，成为全球历...

史上最大IPO来临，散户有哪些SpaceX打新渠道？

越南资产市场正迎来一个重要的里程碑，持牌交易所预计将于2026年第三季度开始运营。在背景下，越南的法律框架已基本完善……

关于在越南建立资产专业人士认证体系的提案。

6月9日，Sahara AI项目的SAHARA代币在短时间内意外暴跌近60%。这一突如其来的暴跌引发了投资社群对背后真正原因的诸多疑问……

Arbitrum被要求为Kelp复苏计划解冻价值7100万美元的ETH

被冻结的ETH已成为复苏计算的核心。

Arbitrum的治理现在面临着更艰难的抉择。