Recently, Solana, as a high-performance blockchain platform, has attracted significant attention from developers. Its RPC (Remote Procedure Call) system serves as a core component for building decentr...

<p>Recently, Solana, as a high-performance blockchain platform, has attracted significant attention from developers. Its RPC (Remote Procedure Call) system serves as a core component for building decentralized applications (dApps). This article will delve into the working principles of Solana RPC and compare major RPC service providers supporting Solana, helping developers choose solutions tailored to their needs.</p><p></p><h3>​<strong>​1. Why Focus on Solana RPC?​</strong>​</h3><p>Solana is renowned for its high throughput (&gt;50,000 TPS) and low latency, but achieving these performance advantages heavily relies on efficient RPC nodes. All operations—whether querying account balances, sending transactions, or monitoring on-chain events—require interaction through RPC interfaces.</p><p>​<strong>​The Critical Role of Solana RPC​</strong>​Solana RPC is the key interface for applications to interact with the Solana blockchain, allowing developers to access blockchain data (e.g., account balances, transaction history) and submit new transactions via RPC nodes. Research indicates that RPC nodes are dedicated servers that do not participate in consensus mechanisms but focus on efficiently processing data queries and transaction requests. Solana’s RPC system is designed for speed and scalability, leveraging the platform’s high throughput (&gt;2k TPS) and low latency, making it ideal for building high-performance dApps.</p><p>​<strong>​Developer Pain Points​</strong>​: High costs of self-hosting nodes (hardware, bandwidth, maintenance) and difficulty handling traffic spikes.​<strong>​User Needs​</strong>​: Smooth DApp experiences depend on RPC node responsiveness and stability.Thus, selecting a reliable RPC provider is critical for Solana ecosystem development.</p><h3>​<strong>​2. Core Working Principles of Solana RPC​</strong>​</h3><ol><li><div></div><ul><li><div>​<strong>​Data Queries​</strong>​: Fetching block information (<code>getBlock</code>), account balances (<code>getBalance</code>).</div></li><li><div>​<strong>​Transaction Submission​</strong>​: Sending signed transactions (<code>sendTransaction</code>).</div></li><li><div>​<strong>​Event Subscriptions​</strong>​: Real-time monitoring of on-chain activities via WebSocket (e.g., account changes, log updates).</div></li></ul></li><li><div>​<strong>​Node Types and Roles​</strong>​</div><ul><li><div>​<strong>​Validator Node​</strong>​: Participates in consensus and maintains blockchain state, typically not exposing RPC publicly.</div></li><li><div>​<strong>​RPC Node​</strong>​: Designed for external requests, categorized as:</div><ul><li><div>​<strong>​Public RPC​</strong>​: Free but rate-limited (e.g., Solana’s official endpoint <code>api.mainnet-beta.solana.com</code>).</div></li><li><div>​<strong>​Dedicated RPC​</strong>​: Provided by service providers, supports high concurrency and low latency (paid).</div></li></ul></li></ul></li><li><div>Solana offers both public and private RPC endpoints. Public endpoints like Devnet are free but rate-limited, non-scalable, and lack Service Level Agreements (SLAs), with risks of suspension due to abuse. Private RPC endpoints, provided by service providers, offer auto-scaling, custom rate limits, and are suitable for production environments.</div><ul><li><div>Developers send requests to RPC nodes via API.</div></li><li><div>Nodes validate requests and query local data (blocks, transactions, accounts).</div></li><li><div>Return JSON-formatted responses (success or error codes).</div></li></ul></li></ol><h3>​<strong>​3. Top Solana RPC Providers: Features and Pricing​</strong>​</h3><p>Based on April 2025 market data, below are the major RPC service providers supporting Solana, with key details summarized:</p><p>ProviderFree Tier ExamplePaid Plans (Starting)Key FeaturesUptime GuaranteeLatency OptimizationSupport DetailsAlchemy~12M transactions$49 (~16M)99.9% uptime, Smart Wallets99.9%Distributed design, Supernode98% CSAT, dedicated Customer Product Engineers (CPEs)Helius500K credits$49 (10M)Dedicated nodes, Tx Parsing APIN/AGlobal nodes (US, EU, Asia)Community support (free), 24/7 support (paid)Quicknode10M credits/month$49 (20M)Low latency, NFT queries99.99%Dedicated &amp; geo-located nodesCommunity support (free), 8-12h response (premium)Chainstack3M req/month$49 (20M)Self-healing nodes, scaling99.9%Geo-location, Bolt technology24/5 email (&lt;24h), 24/7 chat/call (premium)Ankr1M req/dayPAYG (Custom)30 public nodes, dedicatedN/A30 global nodes, dedicatedDiscord, Telegram, Reddit; custom SLA (premium)</p><p>​<strong>​Note​</strong>​: Terms like “credits” or “transactions” may vary by provider—refer to official documentation.</p><h3>​<strong>​4. Provider Comparison: Pros and Cons​</strong>​</h3><p>When selecting an RPC provider, cost, performance, features, and support are key considerations. Below is a detailed analysis:</p><p>​<strong>​Alchemy​</strong>​</p><ul><li><div>​<strong>​Pros​</strong>​: 99.9% uptime SLA for high-reliability projects; rich features like Smart Wallets and Webhooks; generous free tier (~12M transactions).</div></li><li><div>​<strong>​Cons​</strong>​: Free tier limits; higher entry cost for paid plans ($49+), less suitable for budget-constrained startups.</div></li></ul><p>​<strong>​Helius​</strong>​</p><ul><li><div>​<strong>​Pros​</strong>​: Solana-specialized with dedicated nodes and transaction parsing APIs; flexible pricing; global nodes reduce latency.</div></li><li><div>​<strong>​Cons​</strong>​: Low free tier (500K credits); no explicit uptime SLA; slower community support.</div></li></ul><p>​<strong>​Quicknode​</strong>​</p><ul><li><div>​<strong>​Pros​</strong>​: 99.99% uptime, scalable for high traffic; NFT query tools; strong free tier (10M credits/month).</div></li><li><div>​<strong>​Cons​</strong>​: Premium plans required for advanced features; higher costs for enterprise tiers (e.g., $299 Scale).</div></li></ul><p>​<strong>​Chainstack​</strong>​</p><ul><li><div>​<strong>​Pros​</strong>​: Self-healing nodes and dynamic scaling; 99.9% uptime; multi-channel support (Telegram/Discord).</div></li><li><div>​<strong>​Cons​</strong>​: Limited free tier (3M req/month); premium support requires additional fees.</div></li></ul><p>​<strong>​Ankr​</strong>​</p><ul><li><div>​<strong>​Pros​</strong>​: Generous free tier (1M req/day); 30 global nodes; custom SLA for premium plans.</div></li><li><div>​<strong>​Cons​</strong>​: No uptime SLA; rate limits on free tier; opaque pricing for PAYG.</div></li></ul><p>​<strong>​Recommendations​</strong>​:</p><ul><li><div>​<strong>​Startups/Testing​</strong>​: Use free tiers (e.g., Alchemy’s 12M transactions, Quicknode’s 10M credits).</div></li><li><div>​<strong>​Mid-Scale Projects​</strong>​: Mid-tier plans like Helius Developer ($49, 10M credits) balance cost and features.</div></li><li><div>​<strong>​Enterprise Applications​</strong>​: Custom plans (e.g., Alchemy Enterprise, Quicknode Scale) offer scalability and 24/7 support.</div></li></ul><h3>​<strong>​5. Best Practices for Optimizing RPC Performance​</strong>​</h3><ol><li><div>​<strong>​Request Batching and Caching​</strong>​</div><ul><li><div>​<strong>​Batch Queries​</strong>​: Use <code>getMultipleAccounts</code> to fetch multiple account data in one call.</div></li><li><div>​<strong>​Local Caching​</strong>​: Cache static data (e.g., NFT metadata) to reduce RPC load.</div></li></ul></li><li><div>// Example: Exponential backoff retry  async function sendTransactionWithRetry(connection, signedTx, maxRetries = 3) {    let retries = 0;    while (retries &lt; maxRetries) {      try {        return await connection.sendRawTransaction(signedTx.serialize());      } catch (error) {        retries++;        await new Promise(resolve =&gt; setTimeout(resolve, 1000 * retries));      }    }    throw new Error(&#34;Transaction failed after retries&#34;);  }  </div></li><li><div>​<strong>​Monitoring and Alerts​</strong>​</div><ul><li><div>Use Prometheus + Grafana to track RPC response times and error rates.</div></li><li><div>Set threshold alerts (e.g., trigger Slack notifications if error rate exceeds 5%).</div></li></ul></li></ol><h3>​<strong>​Conclusion​</strong>​</h3><p>Solana RPC is a core tool for developers building efficient dApps, operating via JSON-RPC protocols through dedicated nodes. Choosing the right provider requires balancing cost, performance, and support. Providers like Alchemy, Helius, and Quicknode cater to different project scales. Developers should evaluate free tiers and paid plans based on specific needs to optimize their Solana development experience.</p><p>​<strong>​Next Steps​</strong>​:</p><ul><li><div>Test free tiers (e.g., Alchemy’s 300M requests).</div></li><li><div>const backupRpcUrls = [    &#34;https://solana-mainnet.g.alchemy.com/v2/YOUR_KEY&#34;,    &#34;https://solana-api.projectserum.com&#34;  ];  </div></li></ul><p><a href="https://academy.pandatool.org/en_US/" rel="nofollow">PandaAcamey</a> — Web3 Learning Center owned by <a href="https://www.pandatool.org/#/dashboard?lang=en-US" rel="nofollow">PandaTool</a></p>

Followin

In-Depth Analysis of Solana RPC Providers: A 2025 Developer’s Guide

最近，Solana作為一個高效能區塊鏈平臺，吸引了開發者的廣泛關注。其RPC（遠端過程呼叫）系統作為去中心化應用的核心元件...

最近，Solana作為一個高效能區塊鏈平臺，吸引了開發者的大量關注。其RPC（遠端過程呼叫）系統是構建去中心化應用（dApp）的核心元件。本文將深入探討Solana RPC的工作原理，並比較支援Solana的主要RPC服務提供商，幫助開發者選擇適合自身需求的解決方案。

Solana RPC 提供程序深度分析：2025 年開發者指南

跟之前說的一樣,我們到關鍵位置溜!
如果能穩穩站上 那就可以去前高~!
如果上不去也別直接空,跌下來要等回踩的,性價比不佳 不如不做,除非小級別有出下降趨勢不然直接下來不能空

喊單點位丨BTC

熊市就是學習的好時間 ， 這邊分享一個rsi的終極用法
絕對的s級 alpha，
你以往用的方式絕對是錯誤的,而且rsi從來都不是一個新手指標，
要知道,rsi是一個相對強弱指數（RSI） ， 是一個動能指標，
一開始大家會用超買超賣來理解 ， 後來近幾年大家會用RSI背離來看盤，
但rsi最大的寶藏在於順勢交易中的背離回踩,才是讓你在大趨勢中可以上車的利器，
其實rsi主要有兩種策略：
1. 利...

Alpha分享丨90%的人不知道的RSI用法

幣安近日官方公佈了其項目上幣路線圖和詳細的註冊指南，揭示了加密項目從早期階段到最終上線的完整“路徑”……