Apple is currently blocking Epic Games Sweden’s Fortnite notarization despite finding no rule violations, while demanding we revoke our Fortnite submission to the US App Store. We are going back to US court to argue that Apple is again violating the injunction.

Apple told Epic it should submit Fortnite for the US through their Swedish account, and Epic did just that.
Then Apple changed their mind and said they would not review it until the court ruled.
Apple keeps choosing poorly.

Kosta Eleftheriou

Twitter

儘管沒有發現任何違規行為，但蘋果目前仍在阻止 Epic Games Sweden 對 Fortnite 的公證，同時要求我們撤銷向美國 App Store 提交的 Fortnite。我們將回到美國法院，辯稱蘋果再次違反了禁令。

加密風險投資基金 Hashed 近期發佈了一份題為《協議經濟：2026 年展望》的戰略報告，其中指出加密貨幣行業即將進入“……階段”。

哈希值：與實體經濟掛鉤的數字資產項目將在 2026 年蓬勃發展。

文章作者：林晚晚的貓(@linwanwan823)
文章來源：X
原文標題：華人首富趙長鵬年終十大問答
---------------------------------------------------------------
BNB股東年終大會剛剛結束。
聽完CZ的年終AMA，晚晚我選了10條問答總結
劃重點：預測市場，穩定幣大戰2.0還沒開始
1.被特赦後什麼感受？
CZ："心理上有一種v...

趙長鵬年終答卷：關於幣安、監管與加密未來的十問

日本央行官方將基準利率上調至 30 年來的最高水平，標記世界第三大經濟體的貨幣政策迎來了一個重要的轉折點。

日本繼續上漲利率，達到30年來的最高水平。

As a result, Fortnite is offline on iOS in the European Union indefinitely despite being distributed through the Epic Games Store there. Apple’s abuse of its interlocked web of controls shows that any notarization process must be in the hands of an independent body.

因此，儘管 Fortnite 透過 Epic Games Store 發行，但它仍無限期地在歐盟的 iOS 上下線。蘋果濫用其錯綜複雜的控制網絡表明，任何公證過程都必須由獨立機構負責。

There are plenty of examples of independent bodies ensuring security, rather than monopoly control by a single corporation motivated to undermine competition. HTTPS security is an example, and has worked fantastically on the web for decades.

有許多例子表明，獨立機構可以確保安全，而不是由一家旨在破壞競爭的單一公司進行壟斷控制。 HTTPS 安全性就是一個例子，幾十年來它在網路上發揮了出色的作用。