The potential of social media is incredible - you have so much potential to explore the evidence of something and then come to an enlightened opinion a bit later. This is called rationality.
The reality is that this is short-circuited by a rush to judgement... any investigation that might run counter to the accepted narrative is condemned as 'leftist' etc. Sheer madness.😒

Twitter

社群媒體的潛力是巨大的——你可以利用它去探索事物的證據，然後再過一段時間形成自己深刻的觀點。這叫做理性。
現實情況是，這種草率的判斷阻礙了整個過程……任何可能與既定敘事相悖的調查都會被譴責為「左翼」等等。簡直是瘋了。 😒

1 月 9 日，代幣化現實世界資產達到 197.2 億美元，這是該市場最接近 200 億美元Threshold的一次。
該數字衡量的是分佈式資產，即在網絡上流通的代幣……

代幣化國債價格飆升125%，形成了一種“可編程現金”循環，各大銀行正爭相效仿。

當市場為創新速度焦慮時，往往忽略了以太坊最核心的不可複製資產——一套不可妥協的價值觀。

穿透 Ethereum“退化”喧囂：為什麼“以太坊價值觀”是最寬的護城河？

根據一項新的技術分析，比特幣價格已回落至其“崩盤線”，引發了人們對價格可能出現牛市反彈的猜測。但撰寫該分析的專家認為，這並非……

比特幣價格觸及崩盤線，但這次並非偶然。

Of course, when you are investigating at the start, when you have yet to come to a conclusion, you have to entertain various ideas... and then rule them out in a process.
This does not generally happen on social media because people do not want to appear wrong on something.... but that is part and parcel of the process.
For example, my suggestion of an innocent U-turn would be invalidated by finding out they were protesters... and had been involved with protest earlier.
This would go to further explain the situation, where further questions would be raised - was this personal? Were the ICE agents familiar with these women from previous incidents?

當然，在調查初期，在得出結論之前，你必須考慮各種可能性……然後逐一排除。

這種情況在社交媒體上通常不會發生，因為人們不想在某件事上顯得自己錯了……但這卻是調查過程的一部分。

例如，我之前提出的“無意掉頭”的說法，如果發現她們是抗議者……而且之前也參與過抗議活動，那麼這個說法就站不住腳了。

這會進一步解釋當時的情況，並引發更多疑問——這是否與個人有關？移民執法局（ICE）的探員是否在之前的事件中認識這些女性？