The White House has just had the most recent closed-door meeting related to the regulation of stablecoins. The discussion was characterized by the officials as fruitful. Nevertheless, there was no con...

<div><div>
<p>The White House has just had the most recent closed-door meeting related to the regulation of stablecoins. The discussion was characterized by the officials as fruitful. Nevertheless, there was no consensus. The administration instead gave a time limit. Pressure is now on the lawmakers to find a compromise on the CLARITY Act by March 1. Both banks and crypto firms are put on the spot by that deadline.</p>
<adv/><blockquote>
<p>🚨WRAPPED: White House Sets MARCH 1 Deadline on CLARITY Act — “Compromise Is In The Air,” But No Deal Yet 👀🇺🇸<br/><br/>Today’s closed-door stablecoin talks at the White House just ended — both sides called it “productive.”<br/><br/>Banks walked in with a written list of “prohibition… https://t.co/9oz85PPJxE pic.twitter.com/OuUxz6iolR</p>
— Diana (@InvestWithD) February 11, 2026</blockquote>
<adv/><h2><strong><strong>What the CLARITY Act Is Trying to Solve</strong></strong></h2>
<p>The CLARITY Act is intended to add some order to the regulation of digital assets in the U.S. It would have the majority of cryptocurrencies under CFTC regulation. Simultaneously, it would provide a clear understanding of the occasion when the SEC is at liberty. The structure might put an end to decades of regulatory uncertainty. Hence, the bill is viewed by a number of people in crypto as a stepping stone to wider institutional acceptance.</p>
<p>Banks however came in with stiff objections. They presented a written document that had harsh prohibition principles. These tenets focus on the interest and stablecoin yield programs. According to banks, stablecoins with yields pose a threat to the traditional deposit. Consequently, they would like prohibitions on financial motivation of those holding stablecoins. They also suggest minimal exemption, severe punishment, and formal research on the risks of flights of deposits.</p>
<h2><strong>Crypto Firms Push for Flexibility</strong></h2>
<p>Crypto representatives retaliated on the other side. According to them, yield is not a speculation. Rather, it portrays on-chain efficiency. In addition, they caution that the prohibition of rewards would kill innovation. The Chief Legal Officer of Ripple states that a certain compromise is forming. Transaction-related rewards can be exempted. That change would be able to maintain functionality without necessarily competing with bank deposits.</p>
<p>The deadline of the White House changes the nature of negotiations. Concessions are brought by time pressure. The expanded crypto market reforms may once more stall without a deal. Such an outcome would postpone comprehensiveness to exchanges, issuers, and developers. On the contrary, a trade-off would open much desired regulatory assurance. There is a close observation in the markets.</p>
<h2><strong>What This Means for Crypto Markets</strong></h2>
<p>This controversy extends beyond stablecoins. It molds the crypto policy in the U.S. When the legislators find the balance, both innovation and compliance may co-exist. In case of failure in negotiations, the process of fragmentation persists. Anyhow, the result will affect the capital flows, the development of the stablecoins, and the competitiveness of the U.S. in the digital financial sphere.</p>

</div></div>

White House Sets March 1 Deadline for CLARITY Act

白宮剛剛舉行了最近一次關於穩定幣監管的閉門會議。官員們稱此次討論富有成效。然而，會議並未達成任何協議……

<div><div><p>白宮剛剛舉行了最近一次關於穩定幣監管的閉門會議。官員們稱此次討論富有成效。然而，會議並未達成共識。政府反而設定了最後期限。現在，議員們面臨著在3月1日前就《CLARITY法案》達成妥協的壓力。屆時，銀行和加密貨幣公司都將面臨嚴峻考驗。</p><adv/><blockquote><p> 🚨最新消息：白宮將《CLARITY法案》的最後期限定為3月1日——“妥協的跡象已經出現”，但尚未達成協議👀🇺🇸<br/><br/>今天在白宮舉行的閉門穩定幣談判剛剛結束——雙方都稱談判“富有成效”。<br/><br/>班克斯拿著一份“禁令”清單走了進來…… https://t.co/9oz85PPJxE pic.twitter.com/OuUxz6iolR</p> — Diana (@InvestWithD) 2026年2月11日</blockquote><adv/><h2><strong><strong>《CLARITY法案》試圖解決什麼問題？</strong></strong></h2><p> 《CLARITY法案》旨在規範美國數字資產的監管，使大多數加密貨幣納入美國商品期貨交易委員會（CFTC）的監管範圍。同時，該法案也將明確美國證券交易委員會（SEC）的監管權限。這一框架有望終結數十年來監管的不確定性。因此，許多加密貨幣領域的人士將該法案視為加密貨幣獲得更廣泛機構認可的墊腳石。</p><p>然而，銀行提出了強烈的反對意見。他們提交了一份書面文件，其中包含嚴苛的禁止原則。這些原則主要針對利息和穩定幣收益項目。銀行認為，收益型穩定幣對傳統存款構成威脅。因此，他們希望禁止持有穩定幣者進行任何形式的經濟活動。他們還建議限制豁免範圍，嚴懲違規者，並要求對存款外流的風險進行正式研究。</p><h2><strong>加密貨幣公司力求提高靈活性</strong></h2><p>加密貨幣領域的代表則反駁道，他們認為收益並非投機，而是鏈上效率的體現。此外，他們還警告說，禁止獎勵會扼殺創新。Ripple 的首席法務官表示，目前正在形成某種妥協方案：交易相關的獎勵可以被豁免。這一改變既能維持加密貨幣的功能，又不會與銀行存款形成競爭。</p><p>白宮設定的最後期限改變了談判的性質。時間壓力迫使各方做出讓步。如果未能達成協議，擴大加密貨幣市場改革的進程可能再次陷入停滯。這樣的結果將推遲交易所、發行方和開發者全面受益。相反，達成某種妥協將帶來人們渴望已久的監管保障。市場正在密切關注事態發展。</p><h2><strong>這對加密貨幣市場意味著什麼</strong></h2><p>這場爭議的影響遠不止於穩定幣本身，它還塑造著美國的加密貨幣政策。當立法者找到平衡點時，創新與合規便可並存。一旦談判失敗，分裂的局面將持續下去。無論如何，最終結果都將影響資本流動、穩定幣的發展以及美國在數字金融領域的競爭力。</p></div></div>

白宮將《CLARITY法案》的最後期限定為3月1日

世界自由金融公司（World Liberty Financial）的目標是在全球數兆美元的外匯市場——全球最大、流動性最強的金融領域——分一杯羹。

這家與川普政府有關的加密貨幣公司…

川普支持的「世界自由」計畫推出「世界互換」外匯平台

2026 年投資者面臨的問題已不是 「要不要配置」，而是「配多少，以及通過什麼工具配置 」。

ARK Invest：比特幣的機構化之路

作者： The Economist
編譯： 深潮 TechFlow
---------------------------------------------------------------
深潮導讀： 儘管比特幣價格仍處於 7 萬美元上方，但加密市場正經歷著一場前所未有的“孤獨寒冬”。本文深入剖析了本輪跌勢與以往的不同之處：槓桿清算的連鎖反應、曾被寄予厚望的 ETF 如今淪為砸盤推手，以及最...