I guess it’s better to address this than not. It is quite overblown for no reason.
If you are building on Solana, and working your ass off and do not expect things to be handed to you for simply existing, this tweet was not about you.

Can I say something without everyone getting mad?
Solana founders historically were warriors and would do anything to win. Too many teams got comfortable, vesting or whatever.
I don’t disregard anyone’s efforts, but today there is too much entitlement.
You are owed nothing,

chase

Twitter

我覺得有必要談談這件事。它完全是小題大做，毫無根據。
如果你正在Solana上進行開發，並且努力工作，不指望僅僅因為你的存在就能得到回報，那麼這條推文與你無關。

來源：新智元
就在剛剛，AI圈發生了一場足以載入史冊的「閉關鎖國」事件。
Anthropic已正式禁止使用自家套餐接入OpenClaw！！！
Claude Code之父Boris Cherny宣佈：
從美國東部時間4月4日下午3點（北京時間4月5日凌晨3點）開始，Claude封殺全部第三方工具，只能使用額外套餐或API使用這些工具。
[OpenClaw]
這意味著，成千上萬依賴OpenClaw提升...

Anthropic正式封殺OpenClaw，全球開發者24小時血崩

Anthropic Claude Code 負責人 Boris Cherny 宣布，自 2026 年 4 月 […]
〈Anthropic 訂閱 Claude Code 封殺龍蝦 OpenClaw！往後第三方工具僅能付費額度〉這篇文章最早發佈於動區BlockTempo《動區動趨-最具影響力的區塊鏈新聞媒體》。

Anthropic 訂閱 Claude Code 封殺龍蝦 OpenClaw！往後第三方工具僅能付費額度

加密貨幣市場正處於十字路口，準備迎接未來的發展。鑑於金融環境持續動盪，比特幣（$ BTC）已達到至關重要的階段……

比特幣價格停滯預示著突破 71,000 美元阻力位後波動性將大幅擴大

If I had to guess, your tweets are a consequence of too many teams asking you for grants to continue building
It might help to develop a clear mandate for what or who you give grants to vs not
It constricts the opportunity space but also makes the rules of the road clear

如果我沒猜錯的話，你的推文是因為太多團隊向你申請資助以繼續開發而導致的。

或許你應該明確規定資助對象和資助範圍。

這雖然會縮小資助機會的範圍，但也讓規則更加清晰。