Examining the Difficulties and Opportunities of the Crypto Market from the Perspective of Financial History

This article is machine translated
Show original
rounded

Written by: 0xSheldon@TPTrade, Jerry@TPDAO


Introduction


If we look at the rise and fall of Athens, the origin of world financial history, we are pessimistic - finance only serves money, allowing money to make more money; and the prosperity and diversified development of finance depend on war, which is bloody and tragic.

But the ups and downs of New York give us confidence. Wall Street has faced the crisis of extinction more than once, but it has never perished and instead prospered. This is because New York finance has been injected with the gene of "optimizing capital allocation" from the beginning. It is worth mentioning that in the development of modern finance in New York, the role of funds is indispensable and plays a very special role.
So, what about the crypto market?


01 The Rise and Fall of Athens


Taking Athens as an example, we can more easily see that the essence of finance is exploitation. Look at how cruel the "six-one farmer" in Athens was - the borrower had to take five-sixths of the harvest as interest, and could only keep one-sixth; if the five-sixths of the harvest was not enough to pay the interest, the creditor had the right to sell the debtor and his children into slavery.


Thanks to its special geographical location, among the Mediterranean civilizations, Athens rose with commerce but was destroyed by finance.


The colorful Athenian civilization once represented the light of human civilization. In the war situation, Athens, which was heavily dependent on the commercial economy, had to seek financial support - maritime credit appeared, primary banking formats also appeared, and temples also began to do lending business... Finance brought economic prosperity to Athens, but under the impact of money, once the war was lost, the sense of civic duty that had previously been involved in the war disappeared. What is more serious is that the citizens' former sense of morality has also been lost. Moral decline will follow an irreversible ratchet effect - that is, people's consumption habits are irreversible after they are formed, and it is easy to adjust upwards but difficult to adjust downwards.


It can be said that the destruction of Athens began with its internal collapse.


02 New York Ups and Downs


The first choice for understanding the typical representative of modern financial history is undoubtedly the ups and downs of Wall Street, and one of the most exciting elements is funds. When the financial market develops to a certain extent, individual investors are less and less important on Wall Street, and more and more funds are handed over to institutional investors for management. In 1961, the trading volume of individual investors accounted for 51.4% of the total trading volume of the New York Stock Exchange, and institutional investors accounted for 26.2%; in 1969, the share of institutional investors rose to 42.4%, and the share of individual investors fell to 33.4%.


The biggest driving force behind the subsequent bull market was the sharp increase in the turnover rate of institutional investors' portfolios, which promoted the steady increase in trading volume. In 1955, the annual turnover rate of mutual funds was about 1/6; in 1960, a turnover rate of 50% was already normal; institutional investors were also conducting block trades (buying and selling securities in quantities of 10,000 shares or more at a time is called a block trade).


In the late 1960s, people blamed Wall Street for the bear market, and the argument that "Wall Street is dying" appeared again during the Great Depression of the 1930s.


However, Wall Street not only did not perish, but on the contrary, it ushered in a new round of victory. Thanks to the timely promotion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, technology came to save Wall Street. This can happen because New York finance, which emerged under the wave of the industrial revolution, has an excellent gene of "finance empowering industry", and Wall Street has assumed the role of "capital optimization allocation".


This is enough for countries around the world to learn from, and will also be applicable to the crypto ecosystem.


03 Encryption new machine

Thanks to the support of Wall Street brought by Bitcoin ETF, this bull market is still only a bull market for Bitcoin. Therefore, we believe that the reason why this bull market cannot be bullish is that the crypto market lacks the motivation of "native crypto funds".


There are many analyses on the reasons why the bull market is not bullish, the most mainstream one is that VC coins and meme coins complement each other. We believe that the reason behind this is still the lack of "native crypto funds" in the crypto market.


VC institutions capable of discovering high-quality projects are extremely rare. A large number of VC institutions choose to follow the investment behavior, which leads to inflated valuations of VC coins before they are listed, causing the coin to reach its peak as soon as it is listed. The "leeks" who have seen coins that have increased by 100 times are still immersed in them, and are therefore keen on meme coins, but their fate is even more tragic than a life-and-death struggle. Most meme coins will return to zero, and a meme coin that has increased by 100 times is one in a million.


Analogous to the ups and downs of New York finance, in the history of the development of the crypto market, this bull market is the moment when "native crypto funds" take the center stage (the concept of crypto funds here excludes venture capital funds and specifically refers to quantitative hedge funds and value investment funds that focus on the secondary market).


Compared with crypto funds in the traditional financial market, they must have the ability to invest in currencies other than Bitcoin and Ethereum. Whether it is quantitative investment or value investment, they have their own logic and keen sense of smell.


Obviously, whether it is the crypto funds in the traditional financial market or the "native crypto funds", they are all passionate about money; but for the "native crypto funds", what is more important is faith. In 2021, a large number of traditional financial funds and excellent traders from traditional institutions who were passionate about money flocked in, but after the baptism of 2023, those who remained were still passionate about this industry.


The activeness of the secondary market will bring prosperity to the primary market. It is precisely because the market has not withstood the baptism that the development of "crypto applications" that was originally expected has also fallen into shackles. In the crypto world, the performance of public chains has been greatly improved, cross-chain interoperability has made great progress, and basic elements such as NFT and DID have been continuously improved. "AI+Web3", "DePin" and gamefi/chain games that have had a practical basis in the previous cycle are just thunder and rain. The reason for the restriction is that the role of "finance empowering industry" and "finance promoting capital optimization allocation" in the crypto market have not yet been played.


The starting point of all these changes should be the breakthrough of this round of "bull market is not bullish". The key factor of the breakthrough lies in "native crypto funds". We believe that the role, status and function of "native crypto funds" and the value opportunities they bring will gradually emerge in this cycle. Will you be among them?

Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
1
Add to Favorites
Comments