The Holy Grail of Decentralization: Ethereum’s Long-term Value and Challenges

This article is machine translated
Show original

Author: Revc, Jinse Finance

Preface

Ethereum's current development status is a microcosm of the entire crypto industry. As the most valuable asset in the industry, being Fud at the end of the interest rate hike cycle is also a good thing for self-examination. Ethereum also has profound problems that lead to poor performance, namely, the weakening of its control over L2, and the inability to condense value economically with the influence of decentralized infrastructure. When the market is in an upward cycle, it can expand its influence through L2. After all, the market's main focus in 2021 is cross-chain and expansion, but now the market has changed. Here we think about two questions:

  • Balance between decentralization and commercial interests: How can decentralized projects achieve commercialization without violating the principle of decentralization?

  • Driving force behind ETH value growth: In addition to decentralization, what other factors can drive the growth of ETH value?

From the perspective of the development of the entire crypto industry, especially in the L2 economic system, the value of Ethereum is decreasing, and there is no sign of easing. Ethereum may even be replaced one day. First, it will be replaced economically , which has already happened , followed by technology and security , and finally decentralized political correctness . The main force driving all this is that the market is changing. This round of interest rate hikes is coming to an end, and most of the naked swimmers and bubble assets have been cleared. This cycle has a profound impact on the crypto industry. For Ethereum, the industry's attention has shifted from decentralized construction to short-term Meme hype profits. In the cycle of liquidity tightening, the market rarely gives builders positive feedback.

At present, the construction of the entire crypto industry revolves around an expectation, that is, the Fed's interest rate cut. The strong inertia of this expectation is generated against the background of the release of $3 trillion in liquidity from the new crown in 2021. Now the entire industry is running wildly in violation of business laws and common sense. Assuming that as long as the Fed releases water, the cost of crypto infrastructure can be distributed to users, and the VC tokens issued will skyrocket. The leeks and big players also think so, but is history really like this? It may be like this in the latitude of a ten-year cycle, but if you use a microscope to observe carefully from a quarterly time or even a shorter interval, there are too many losers in investing in this swamp. Back to this article, if the Fed's interest rate cut is less than expected and global liquidity continues to be tight , then projects that rely on the sky ( interest rate cut ) will starve to death , and projects with endogenous motivation will gradually exercise vitality to adapt to the environment and get rid of the Fed's monetary policy cycle . The endogenous motivation of crypto projects comes from the persistence of decentralized beliefs and the most basic business common sense . Ethereum currently maintains an advantage in the former .

Ethereum Foundation AMA Summary and Thoughts

The Ethereum Foundation recently held an AMA to respond to Fud, which sparked industry discussion and feedback. We extended our thinking on the Foundation’s point of view.

1. As L2 solutions mature, will Ethereum continue to expand L1? What are the feasible expansion solutions?

  • Justin Drake: In the long run, the Ethereum team plans to use SNARKs technology to significantly improve the processing power of L1 and achieve almost unlimited expansion. Through SNARKs, heavy computing tasks can be moved off-chain, thereby reducing the burden on nodes.

  • Vitalik Buterin: In the short term, EIP-4444 is the most feasible solution, which can effectively increase the Gas limit. In the long term, the client needs to be optimized in terms of execution, state reading and writing, data bandwidth, etc.

  • Dankrad Feist: L1 expansion and L2 development are parallel and do not conflict. L1 expansion is limited by data availability and single thread, but through zkEVM and parallelization, L1's processing power can be greatly improved.

Extended thinking : The Ethereum Foundation currently adheres to the purest decentralized development route, but commercial considerations are insufficient. Although the host asked technical questions about the direction of expansion, the main problem of Ethereum at present is not expansion. If Gas is used as a quantitative indicator of income from providing services, then the service has not had good bargaining and rigid demand performance in the near future. We can simply sort out several links of Ethereum service output, Pos consensus maintenance , security base , Web 3 developer platform , middleware , financial settlement layer , application layer . If there is no developed application layer , other service links can eventually be replaced , Restake or an L1, because people's belief in decentralization or demand is supplemented. In the face of L2, there is no strong means to upgrade technology and enhance value cohesion. The application layer is in the highest strategic position for all public chains . The application layer should be upstream of the public chain and be the provider of traffic and users , rather than downstream as the recipient of public chain services . To think about this issue clearly, it is necessary to redesign the token economic system of the public chain until there are enough application layer dApps to form a prosperous ecology and market, and then adjust the premium service method. Similar to Pumpfun and Friendtech, neither of them happened directly in the Ethereum ecosystem. Compared with the old-fashioned infrastructure Lego puzzle of the Ethereum ecosystem, no matter how they are evaluated, they have generated income and attracted users.

If Layer2 is compared to a middleware infrastructure that provides users with greater flexibility and composability, then any commercial service link that cannot be touched by the Ethereum mechanism may cause the related local infrastructure to be separated from the Ethereum ecosystem, because the law of the market is to reduce infrastructure costs and seize profits in this sector. To put it bluntly, it means issuing coins whenever possible.

A rule is gradually emerging in the blockchain world . Decentralized public chains that only focus on infrastructure lack market fit , that is, the official-led application layer . In the short term , their voice will be taken away by the middleware infrastructure that is closer to users and has commercial rationality . In the long term, the latter will build their own ecosystem . The migration of dydx from Ethereum has given the industry inspiration . Whoever is closer to users has the strongest voice .

2. Max Resnick believes that the relationship between L2 and L1 is parasitic, and L2 is unwilling to decentralize the sorter. What does the Ethereum Foundation think about this?

Justin Drake: L2 does not want to gain more revenue through centralized sorters. The concept of "sorter fees" itself is misleading. L2's main income comes from executing congestion fees, not sorting. L2 actually has an incentive to decentralize sorters because this helps maximize fee income. Shared sorters help improve composability across L2, but achieving shared sorters requires the joint efforts of the community. Sorter decentralization faces challenges in security, MEV, and performance.

Further thinking : At present, L2’s solution has problems such as sorter centralization, user and capital separation, etc. In essence, L2’s initial development may be parasitic on Ethereum, but in the later stage, it will strive for more independence. If L2 is strong enough to get rid of the constraints of Ethereum, the most important thing is the political correctness of building its own decentralization. It is also a natural trend for L2’s value contribution to ETH to decrease.

3. If a prosperous Rollup ecosystem develops on Ethereum L1, but the value growth of ETH is limited, does it mean that Ethereum’s roadmap has failed?

  • Dankrad Feist: The success of the Ethereum ecosystem should not be measured only by the value growth of ETH. If Ethereum can provide diverse applications and bring value to users, then even if the value growth of ETH is limited, it can be considered a success. L1 and L2 are symbiotic, L1 provides infrastructure, and L2 provides diverse applications, which together expand the scale of the ecosystem.

  • Justin Drake: The value accumulation of ETH depends on the transaction volume and its use as a collateral asset. Even if the fee per transaction is low, a large enough transaction volume can bring in considerable income. The more ETH is used as a collateral asset, the more stable its value will be.

  • Anders Elowsson: The value accumulation of ETH is closely related to the long-term sustainable development of the Ethereum ecosystem. Excessive focus on short-term value accumulation may affect the long-term development of the ecosystem. Although the value growth of ETH may not be the most important metric, it is still an important indicator.

Further thinking : As Dankrad Feist said, Ethereum is building a financial platform, which will be the most neutral platform to date, allowing the issuance and trading of financial assets, and also allowing the creation of new financial products such as derivatives on its basis . The core of Ethereum's current construction is to make crypto natives realize that Ethereum is the purest decentralized smart contract platform , and the infrastructure Lego and applications built on it inherit its relevant characteristics . So this is a long-term process , and we should not only focus on the short-term value distribution related to L2 .

However, the positioning of "L1 provides infrastructure, L2 provides diversified applications" is flawed. First, how to bind the value and prevent it from changing in a direction that is unfavorable to L1, and how to ensure that L1 has the right to speak and constrain L2. Decentralized political correctness alone is not enough, and technical dependence is also fragile. L2 began to need Ethereum's political correctness to attract TVL and issue coins, and after that, the dependence became lower and lower.

What Ethereum needs to explode

Let’s briefly analyze the factors needed for Ethereum to explode. Just like the excerpt from a cool novel, Ethereum is still the place where a lot of industry hopes are placed.

1. With sufficient liquidity during the Fed’s rate cut cycle, it would be best if there were a wave of liquidity flooding, so that the crypto market can enjoy the flood while Fud’s traditional currency.

2. Strengthen the means of centralization other than decentralized political correctness, specifically the means of condensing value in the technical aspects. The official can refuse to recognize the unrestrained packaging asset behavior of VC on each L2.

3. Give enough respect and attention to the application layer, especially the SocialFi track, instead of just supporting Farcaster and ENS. Put aside the high profile of decentralized developers, listen more to the opinions of product managers and demand analysts, and allocate part of the voice from decentralized governance and development to application layer construction, and strive to adapt to the market.

summary 

Economic relations between market organizations are easy to establish , but political correctness is difficult to establish and maintain for a long time . Therefore, Ethereum is still the most valuable asset in the blockchain industry, and with the efforts of the foundation and the ecosystem, it maintains its industry status as the holy grail of decentralization.

However, decentralization does not mean that there is a reasonable business logic to capture cash flow in the market. Non-financial users do not have such high faith in decentralization and service needs, especially before the large-scale popularization of Web3. This discomfort is very obvious. Decentralized construction is not as sexy as the story of Meme making money, and it is not as strong as the wealth effect of the application layer. This is a problem we see in the short term. The developer incentives at the application layer involve adjustments to the execution layer, consensus layer, and economic system. Whether Ethereum can maintain its leading position in the future, we hope to see more innovations in addition to decentralization.

In addition, from the perspective of liquidity, the funds of the Ethereum ecosystem have also been overly diluted by VC coins. Only the top ten product protocols in the ecosystem will have nearly $3 billion worth of tokens unlocked in the next six months. The author can't help but think of a photo of Vitalik on his way back to the hotel after a meeting, wearing a 200-yuan Uniqlo suit, followed by a group of traditional VC elites in suits and leather shoes. Decentralization is a battle, and we need this holy grail to resist the hunting of sophisticated and selfish traditional elites.

Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments