火星财经消息，根据cointelegraph相关报道，在加密货币行业，阴谋论和诈骗谣言相当普遍，但有时，从社交媒体获取大量信息的散户交易者只是缺乏基本的市场知识。例如，最近一些著名的加密货币市场分析师发现了一个所谓的“币安操纵者”，该实体进行比特币期货交易，据称，这是比特币在 66,000 美元处受阻以及今天随后重新测试 63,500 美元支撑位的主要原因之一。尽管有无可否认的证据表明存在大量报价和交易，但一些未经证实的假设和有缺陷的假设使人们相信该实体有效地试图压低比特币的价格。即使假设同一实体在比特币期货订单簿上提出了多个大额报价，也不可能知道其是否使用其他账户进行购买。
大型交易部门拥有单独的投资工具用于套利和长期持有是很常见的，这并不违法，即使对于传统资产管理公司和对冲基金来说也并不罕见。
因此，人们可以利用表面上的大量出价（即所谓的欺骗）来制造恐惧、不确定性和怀疑，同时偷偷购买这些合约。从本质上讲，投资者看起来像是一个大卖家，而实际上这个实体是衍生品合约的净买家——币安未平仓合约的增加支持了这一理论。
另一个相互矛盾的数据来源是买方，订单簿分析师观察到，在突破 64,500 美元的支撑位后，实体在比特币期货上增加了价值超过 4,000 BTC 的买入报价。
因此，这些数据描绘了这样一种情景：看似规模相似的大型实体正在争夺操纵权，但由于投资者已经被迫获利了结，比特币价格恰好走低，因为标准普尔 500 指数期货显示回调，新闻流偏向看跌。主要经济出版物强调了全球增长停滞和中东紧张局势。

<div>火星财经消息，根据cointelegraph相关报道，在加密货币行业，阴谋论和诈骗谣言相当普遍，但有时，从社交媒体获取大量信息的散户交易者只是缺乏基本的市场知识。例如，最近一些著名的加密货币市场分析师发现了一个所谓的“币安操纵者”，该实体进行比特币期货交易，据称，这是比特币在 66,000 美元处受阻以及今天随后重新测试 63,500 美元支撑位的主要原因之一。尽管有无可否认的证据表明存在大量报价和交易，但一些未经证实的假设和有缺陷的假设使人们相信该实体有效地试图压低比特币的价格。即使假设同一实体在比特币期货订单簿上提出了多个大额报价，也不可能知道其是否使用其他账户进行购买。<p>大型交易部门拥有单独的投资工具用于套利和长期持有是很常见的，这并不违法，即使对于传统资产管理公司和对冲基金来说也并不罕见。</p><p>因此，人们可以利用表面上的大量出价（即所谓的欺骗）来制造恐惧、不确定性和怀疑，同时偷偷购买这些合约。从本质上讲，投资者看起来像是一个大卖家，而实际上这个实体是衍生品合约的净买家——币安未平仓合约的增加支持了这一理论。</p><p>另一个相互矛盾的数据来源是买方，订单簿分析师观察到，在突破 64,500 美元的支撑位后，实体在比特币期货上增加了价值超过 4,000 BTC 的买入报价。 </p><p>因此，这些数据描绘了这样一种情景：看似规模相似的大型实体正在争夺操纵权，但由于投资者已经被迫获利了结，比特币价格恰好走低，因为标准普尔 500 指数期货显示回调，新闻流偏向看跌。主要经济出版物强调了全球增长停滞和中东紧张局势。</p></div>

分析：指控“币安操纵者”站不住脚

According to a report by Cointelegraph, conspiracy theories and fraud rumors are quite common in the cryptocurrency industry, but sometimes retail traders who obtain a large amount of information from social media simply lack basic market knowledge. For example, some well-known cryptocurrency market analysts recently discovered a so-called "Binance manipulator" entity that engages in Bitcoin futures trading, which is allegedly one of the main reasons for Bitcoin's resistance at $66,000 and its subsequent retest of the $63,500 support level today. Although there is undeniable evidence of a large number of quotes and trades, unverified assumptions and flawed hypotheses lead people to believe that the entity is effectively trying to push down the price of Bitcoin. Even if it is assumed that the same entity has placed multiple large orders in the Bitcoin futures order book, it is impossible to know whether it is using other accounts to make purchases.

It is common for large trading departments to have separate investment tools for arbitrage and long-term holding, which is not illegal, and is not uncommon even for traditional asset management companies and hedge funds.

Therefore, people can use the apparent large number of bids (i.e., so-called spoofing) to create fear, uncertainty, and doubt, while quietly buying these contracts. Essentially, investors appear to be a large seller, when in fact the entity is a net buyer of derivative contracts - the increase in Binance's open interest contracts supports this theory.

Another conflicting data source is the buyer, as order book analysts have observed that the entity has increased its buy orders on Bitcoin futures worth over 4,000 BTC after the breach of the $64,500 support level.

Therefore, these data paint a scenario where seemingly similar large entities are vying for manipulation control, but Bitcoin prices have happened to decline because investors have been forced to take profits, as the S&P 500 futures indicate a pullback, the news flow is bearish, and major economic publications have emphasized global growth stagnation and Middle East tensions.

<div>Mars Finance News, according to Cointelegraph, conspiracy theories and scam rumors are quite common in the cryptocurrency industry, but sometimes retail traders who get a lot of information from social media simply lack basic market knowledge. For example, recently some well-known cryptocurrency market analysts discovered a so-called &quot;Binance manipulator&quot; who trades Bitcoin futures, which is allegedly one of the main reasons why Bitcoin was blocked at $66,000 and subsequently retested the $63,500 support level today. Despite undeniable evidence of a large number of quotes and transactions, some unconfirmed assumptions and flawed assumptions have led people to believe that the entity is effectively trying to depress the price of Bitcoin. Even assuming that the same entity has made multiple large quotes on the Bitcoin futures order book, it is impossible to know whether it uses other accounts to make purchases.<p> It is common for large trading desks to have separate investment vehicles for arbitrage and long-term holdings, and this is not illegal, and is not uncommon even for traditional asset managers and hedge funds.</p><p> Therefore, one can use the apparent large volume of bids (known as spoofing) to create fear, uncertainty and doubt while secretly buying these contracts. Essentially, the investor looks like a large seller, when in reality the entity is a net buyer of derivative contracts - the increase in Binance open interest supports this theory.</p><p> Another source of conflicting data is on the buy side, with order book analysts observing that entities added over 4,000 BTC worth of buy bids on Bitcoin futures following a breakout of the $64,500 support level.</p><p> The data thus paints a picture of large entities of seemingly similar size vying for control, but as investors have been forced to take profits, Bitcoin prices happen to be trending lower as S&amp;P 500 futures indicate a pullback and news flow is biased towards the bearish side with major economic publications highlighting stagnant global growth and tensions in the Middle East.</p></div>

Analysis: Accusations of “Binance manipulators” don’t hold water

Given the current market environment, I now position myself as a <MEME> coin.

The trend of positioning itself as a meme has still spread to every corner of the crypto

Many investors are predicting that <Bit> (BTC) will soon reach the milestone of $100,000 in the near future. Meanwhile, others are skeptical of the price increase and are waiting for an adjustment. Short-term peak forecast in a cor...

4 Signs to Watch for to Predict When Bitcoin Will Correct

CZ and Vitalik <shill> together, opening up a new continent of crypto imagination?