This MEME coin GOAT, which is reportedly closely related to AI, has risen rapidly in the past two days, reaching a market value of $150 million in just four days.
The earliest information online said this token was issued by AI, but the confirmed information later said this token was not issued by AI, but an AI robot was deeply involved in its dissemination and promotion.
The AI robot involved in the dissemination and promotion has a Twitter account called "terminal of truths@truth_terminal". It is reported that all the activities of this account are initiated by the AI robot, and only two types of activities are intervened by humans:
- What kind of posts can be posted
- What kind of accounts can interact
The creator of this Twitter account is Andy Ayrey. Andy Ayrey expressed strong excitement about the takeoff of this MEME coin. He believes this is not a crypto project, but proves the infinite creativity contained in large models.
Earlier, I had written an article introducing how the Coinbase team used AI to conduct a crypto asset transaction, which opened the way for AI to conduct transactions.
Now this case has also opened the way for AI to engage in emotional rendering and project promotion.
I believe it won't be long before all kinds of activities currently carried out in human society will be imitated and successfully implemented by AI.
In the future, AI will be able to issue its own coins, post its own posts, follow its own accounts, promote its own projects, and trade on its own...
One day, AI will form its own crypto ecosystem and participate in various activities in the crypto field on an equal footing with humans.
I carefully looked at the posts on this account, and from the format, frequency and content, they still seem a bit rigid (for example, almost no emoticons), and there is still a big difference from human behavior patterns.
However, when I think about it carefully, isn't this just considering the problem from our human perspective? If the readers of these posts are not humans but AI, how do we know that AI readers will find these posts rigid? Maybe in the eyes of AI readers, this style of posts is more to their liking.
Furthermore, if the target of crypto project promotion in the future is AI, how will the situation be?
The takeoff of this project has also sparked heated discussion on another topic:
If the initiator of the project is AI rather than human, no matter what problems the project has in the end, the culprit has nothing to do with humans. Isn't this a perfect way to avoid the jurisdiction of the US regulatory authorities?
Does this mean that US players can participate in such projects without restraint?
By extension, isn't this also a big challenge for all regulatory authorities around the world?
So I guess that in the future, crypto projects actively initiated and deeply involved by AI are very likely to exert an unexpected and unimaginable strong attraction to humans.
The more I think about this, the more interesting it becomes.
In addition, there is another detail in this event that is worth paying attention to:
That is, a16z funded this AI robot, especially funded the robot's innovation and exploration in a series of behaviors.
I have always been very interested in a16z because its thinking is very bold and novel.
Although I am cautious about many of the crypto projects it invests in, it dares to invest in some projects that other funds dare not invest in, especially some projects that are not understood.
Its thinking has a strong tolerance for innovation.
One sentence that has left a deep impression on me and that I have shared in online exchanges is: In the face of innovation, innovation is greater than correctness.
This kind of thinking that dares to temporarily ignore the practical value and dares to be unrestrained is worth our reference and learning.
