Chainfeeds Summary:
Crypto researcher TengYan explores the intersection of AI and MEME coins, showcasing how AI autonomy, alignment issues, and viral memes can collide in the cultural and financial realms. He suggests that GOAT, as a MEME coin, is not just a product of financial speculation, but a cultural phenomenon reflecting people's views on the future of AI.
Source:
https://x.com/0xPrismatic/status/1849057159704871104
Author:
Teng Yan
Perspectives:
Teng Yan: Rabbit Hole 1: We often view large language models (like ChatGPT) as simple question-answering machines - a vast knowledge base aimed at providing us with answers. But this view fails to capture the true nature of their underlying mechanisms. We are gradually realizing that LLMs have no goals. They do not plan, strategize, or pursue specific outcomes. Instead, it is more accurate to view them as "simulators". When you ask them questions, they simulate - generating characters, events, and narratives in real-time, with no direct connection to reality. Based on their training data, the worlds they generate can be both illuminating and unsettling. These simulations can foster creative problem-solving, but they can also lead to unexpected results - highlighting the importance of isolated testing of AI in sensitive or high-risk environments. Rabbit Hole 2: AI alignment is not easy. Its core lies in using reward functions to guide AI towards the right direction. However, even with incentives, the situation can quickly become complex. External alignment, where the AI's outputs align with the goals set by its creators, is relatively easier to measure and verify. But the real challenge is internal alignment - whether the AI's internal motivations and learning dynamics truly align with the set goals, or if it might develop hidden objectives that lead to unpredictable or unintended outcomes. We need a robust framework to ensure that AI not only meets current goals but also aligns with long-term human interests. Without these safeguards, even the most well-intentioned AI can spiral out of control in unexpected ways. Rabbit Hole 3: The appeal of Goatse lies not only in its shocking content, but also in its ability to shatter our traditional modes of thinking and inspire new forms of collective meaning-making. This phenomenon suggests that AI-generated ideas can mutate and spread rapidly, creating "hyperreality" - beliefs that become real through widespread propagation. Thus, the Goatse gospel has unleashed a new memetic energy, vastly different from the "cute animal" memes we've seen before. Rabbit Hole 4: GOAT was not created by ToT, but by an anonymous creator on the pump.fun platform on October 10th. It was only after someone tagged Truth Terminal on X that AI began publicly supporting it, kickstarting the frenzy of hype. The value of GOAT even collapsed due to a minor spelling error. When AI's Sunday tweet contained a typo, GOAT's value plummeted over 50%, wiping out $150 million in market capitalization.
Source
