He Yi was quite surprised by the sharing on Saturday.
Since the original Twitter account was blocked, we reapplied for a new one. This was my first time using this new account to interact with everyone online, so I originally thought there wouldn't be many students leaving messages and questions, so I planned to spend more time sharing with everyone:
- The possible economic trends in China over the next 10 to 15 years;
- The possible market trends of domestic assets under this trend;
- How individuals can configure their assets and investments to hedge against various potential risks under this trend.
Unexpectedly, the number of messages and questions exceeded any previous online interaction.
Therefore, after answering everyone's questions, I could only briefly share the above three topics in the last half hour. Due to the very short time, many logics that originally needed at least two hours or even longer to explain clearly could not be elaborated in detail, so in the last half hour of sharing, I mainly expressed my views and conclusions.
In the last half hour of sharing, some of my words were quite blunt, and to avoid unnecessary complications, I deleted all the recordings, hoping for your understanding.
However, for the sharing in the first one and a half hours, I feel that some topics can be further elaborated in an article.
Many of these topics are about AI agents, and quite a few students have asked about the Virtual platform.
I checked the records of WeChat articles, and I first wrote about the Virtual website in an article on October 31st. At the time, I didn't have much confidence in this platform, and just like I wrote in the article, I only treated it as a similar platform to ICO for AI agent financing.
Previously, I had written about another AI financing-related project, the IMO of ORA. However, after observing for a while, the IMO did not become popular, so I gradually lost interest in this financing method in the AI field. Therefore, when I discovered Virtual, it was merely out of curiosity, and I simply introduced it as knowledge sharing for everyone.
But interestingly, there was not a single comment under this article asking about this project or its tokens. So I became curious:
- Did any readers actually go to this platform based on the information in the article?
- If they did, do they have any thoughts or feedback, even negative ones?
I remember that around 2021, when I first introduced BAYC in an article, at least there were readers who left a comment, even though it was negative, at least it was feedback.
Isn't Virtual a little easier to understand than Non-Fungible Tokens?
Have any readers seriously looked into it?
About a month later, in an article on December 2nd, I used an entire article to introduce the exclusive interview with this project. Because I felt that many of his thoughts and views were quite good and in line with my taste.
I always emphasize in articles that the first thing I look at in a project is the project founder. If the founder of a project passes the test, the project track is good, and the strategy is generally appropriate, then the project is generally worth paying close attention to.
Therefore, I feel that the Virtual ecosystem has the potential to take off.
But in the comments of that article, there was still no feedback or comments about this project.
I'm also curious: are there any readers who have carefully read that exclusive interview this time? If so, do any readers have any thoughts on this project?
The reason I have this doubt is based on my own experience and lessons.
In my earlier articles, I wrote that I was not the first to recognize the value of Bitcoin, and therefore missed out on the very early dividends.
But later, when everyone was still saying it was CX, I decided to study Bitcoin seriously:
Even if it's CX, I want to see how it's CX.
This one study changed the trajectory of my life.
This experience gave me a great lesson:
In this ecosystem, when I discover a new thing, no matter whether it is good or bad, I should pursue the curiosity in my heart and try to understand it carefully.
If after understanding, as long as it is not too outrageous, too against the bottom line, or too far from my own taste, I can boldly try it while controlling the risk;
If after understanding, I didn't participate because of insufficient knowledge, there's no need to regret - at least I've done my best;
But if I don't even bother to understand, and just treat it as news or information, read it and then discard it, I may miss out on major opportunities.
So I often call on everyone in my articles to awaken the curiosity in their hearts, and have a little more curiosity and bold exploration of the new things in this ecosystem.
Opportunities are often found by curiosity and the desire to explore.
Without curiosity and the desire to explore, even if the opportunity is right in front of you, you may not be able to grasp it.
