Is the U.S. stock bull market that has lasted for two years and four months really coming to an end?

This article is machine translated
Show original
Here is the English translation:

On October 13, 2022, the S&P 500 index reached a stage bottom of 3,491 points, marking the start of a prolonged bull market that lasted for over two years. On February 19, 2024, it reached a new all-time high of 6,147 points, followed by a subsequent downward adjustment; the performance of the other two major U.S. stock indices (Nasdaq and Dow Jones) was similar. Given that the U.S. stock market has already declined by 10% from its peak (with Nasdaq declining even more), the entire market is focused on a question: Is this the end of the past two years and four months of the great bull market? Or is it another "false fall," like the ones that occurred in July-October 2023, April 2024, and July 2024?

History has proven that predicting the top is as difficult as predicting the bottom. I have several friends with extensive experience in U.S. stock investments, and they all believed that "everything was in place" between April and July 2024, selling off their entire holdings, including Nvidia and Apple. On a monthly or quarterly basis, no one, not even the most advanced quantitative funds, can "accurately" predict the market. However, we can at least discuss some longer-term and more fundamental issues, such as the following two questions:

  1. There is a company with a revenue growth rate of around 5% and a net profit growth rate of around 10%, but its static price-to-earnings ratio is as high as 34 times. Would you be willing to buy it?

  2. There is another company with a revenue growth rate of around 12% and a net profit growth rate of 15-18%, but its static price-to-earnings ratio is as high as 31 times. Would you be willing to buy it?

  3. There is also a company with a revenue growth rate of around 15% and a net profit growth rate of 30-35%, but its static price-to-earnings ratio is as high as 45 times. Would you be willing to buy it?

The three companies mentioned above are: Apple, Microsoft, and Netflix. The first two are the largest and third-largest companies by market capitalization in the U.S. stock market, and the third is also a prominent large-scale technology company and a leader in the entertainment industry. Their P/E/G ratios are clearly far above 1.0; to perform a DCF model on them, one would need very lenient assumptions (such as a very high perpetual growth rate and a very low cost of capital) to conclude that they are undervalued. This is a microcosm of the current state of U.S. tech giants after a 28-month bull market.

Please note that when discussing the valuation of U.S. stocks, we often tend to be led by the computing power industry chain, getting caught in circles like "Is Nvidia a cyclical or growth company?" or "How should we value Broadcom?" The problem is that the computing power industry chain is only a small part of the U.S. stock market, even though it has already given birth to three companies with a market value of over $1 trillion (Nvidia, TSMC, and Broadcom). Since the valuation of the computing power industry chain is widely regarded as "occult," we can set it aside and look at other sectors. At least in the internet industry that I focus on, all the quality companies are not cheap. From a horizontal comparison perspective, some companies are slightly cheaper, such as Google and Meta, but we cannot say that they are "very cheap."

Looking back over the past two years, we can easily find that the U.S. stock market's great bull market was actually supported by two factors that were not entirely related to each other: AI and the economy.

  • Generative AI has significantly boosted the computing power industry chain, while also boosting almost all internet giants. For some companies, such as Nvidia, TSMC, and Microsoft, it has brought real revenue and profit growth; on a broader scale, it has brought confidence.

  • The U.S. economy has turned out to be much more resilient than expected, and the recession that investors were anticipating has not materialized. From July to October 2023, the market experienced a long and anxious adjustment, and then the consensus expectation became that there would be no recession in 2024. U.S. consumer and employment data have been extremely strong, and inflation has also been brought under control to a certain extent.

Starting in the second half of 2024, a third factor was added: the expectation of interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve - this will be the first "normal" rate cut cycle since 2001, without being disrupted by major external events. In this way, the capital market has witnessed an extremely rare "trinity" of positive factors: the overall macroeconomic strength, the flourishing of the new technological revolution, and the Federal Reserve's interest rate cuts! You can hardly imagine a better scenario than this!

Even the frequent international geopolitical tensions in the past two to three years have been providing ammunition for the U.S. stock market: to a certain extent, the U.S. stock market, like gold, plays the role of a geopolitical "safe haven." If you are somewhat concerned about the international situation, but not too much, you may be likely to shift your positions from emerging markets and other developed markets to the U.S. stock market. So we have repeatedly seen that whenever there is a disturbance in any corner of the world, regardless of who wins or loses, the beneficiary is the U.S. stock market. At first glance, this may seem unfair, but it is actually logical.

Here is the English translation:
The current situation is very different from three months ago. First, the pace of interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve is likely to be interrupted, and it may even return to a rate hike trajectory, as inflation has returned. Most American consumers list inflation as their biggest economic concern, and the trade frictions stirred up by the United States will only exacerbate rather than alleviate inflation. In the first half of 2023, the US stock market reversed despite the pressure of the Federal Reserve's rate hikes, but the market valuation level at that time was only about half of the current level. If the expected rate cuts turn into rate hikes, it will obviously be particularly unfavorable for those tech giants whose valuations are at historical highs.

Secondly, when international geopolitical tensions reach a certain level and break through a critical point, the US stock market, like other risky assets, is not immune. Just like in the initial stage of a major flu outbreak, relatively healthy people may be able to stay unaffected, standing out "like a crane among chickens"; but as the flu continues to evolve, even the healthiest people will get sick, with only a difference in the severity of the illness. After all, the US stock market is not gold or US Treasuries, and it will inevitably be affected by geopolitical risks. Are we at that critical point now? It's hard to say, but one thing is certain: we are getting closer and closer to that critical point.
Furthermore, the AI arms race may have progressed to the point where investors feel there is no profit to be made in the short term. By 2025, the total capital expenditure (Capex) plan of US tech giants will exceed $300 billion, with Amazon accounting for $100 billion, Google for $750 billion, and Meta for $600-650 billion - the biggest driver behind this is undoubtedly the procurement of AI computing power. The ever-increasing capital expenditures not only bring heavy depreciation cost pressures, but more importantly, they squeeze free cash flow. It should be noted that one of the important drivers of the US stock market bull market is the continuous dividend buybacks of listed companies, with the amount of dividend buybacks by tech giants often reaching the tens of billions of dollars per quarter; spending a few hundred billion more on computing power means returning a few hundred billion less to shareholders. And 2025 is not the peak of computing power construction, the crazier days are yet to come. This is of course good news for the computing power industry chain, but as the saying goes: the computing power industry chain is only a small part of the US stock market.
As for whether the US economy will enter a recession, it has actually become a less important question. Economic cycles are an objective reality, and there is no economy in the world that only expands and never recesses, and developed economies like the US are particularly unable to avoid this. There will be no recession in 2023, nor in 2024, and probably not in the first half of 2025 either. However, if the Federal Reserve returns to a rate hike trajectory, and the White House refuses to implement fiscal expansion under the banner of "saving", it means a double tightening of fiscal and monetary policies. How strong does the US economy's fundamentals have to be to withstand this double tightening (as well as the pressures of international trade and geopolitics) without a scratch? I can hardly imagine such a possibility.
Let me emphasize again: under any circumstances, predicting the market bottom or top is a thankless task. However, common sense tells us that the capital market is like a pendulum, always swinging between extreme optimism and extreme pessimism, and the law of extremes is an objective rule. Common sense also tells us that no matter how high-quality an asset is, it has a reasonable valuation, and deviating too far from the valuation center will inevitably generate pressure for mean reversion. Mean reversion may occur in a month, three months, or a year, but it will eventually occur in the long run.
Regardless of whether the time for mean reversion has come, one thing I am certain of is that generative AI is a real technological revolution, whose long-term impact may be greater than the Internet itself, reaching the same level as electricity or even fire-making. Something that changes everything in the long run, and is overvalued in the short term, are not contradictory. Because human society progresses in a wave-like manner, if we only know how to linearly extrapolate, we will make the mistake of being overly optimistic at times and overly pessimistic at others. It is precisely because I have full confidence in generative AI that even though I believe the US stock market valuation is seriously overpriced, I am still optimistic in the long run - the adjustment of the valuation of high-quality assets back below the mean is a great thing, and true value investors should welcome this.

Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments