Based on the current information, the problem with Polymarket seems to be that UMA's Optimistic Oracle is too "optimistic" and unable to discern facts to output the correct result (or resolve disputes)? Because according to Polymarket's design, all market disputes are resolved by the UMA Optimistic Oracle "without permission" (original document). The oracle has gone bankrupt, but I see no change in UMA's token price.
This article is machine translated
Show original

constantingao.eth
@ConstantinGao
03-26
昨天polymarket上发生了近期最狂野的一次治理攻击。
有一名UMA大户玩的市场马上要结算了,他本来要亏钱,但他通过最后时刻大量投票劫持预言机,强行通过了现实中没有发生的结果。PM官方事后承认这是一个错误,但认为这是游戏规则一部分,拒绝修改结果,最后大户治理攻击成功,成功实现赌输了也赢钱😂
Sector:
From Twitter
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments
Share





