As Ethereum's transaction fee income declines due to the popularity of L2 technology and is overtaken by many public chains, the market raises doubts: "Is ETH losing its value?" In response, DeFi analyst DefiIgnas and user fabdarice offer their perspectives, emphasizing that evaluating L1 blockchain value should not be based solely on transaction fees, but also include key aspects such as decentralization and ecosystem maturity.
Table of Contents
ToggleTransaction Fees ≠ Value? TRON vs. Ethereum Reveals Key Blind Spots
DefiIgnas pointed out in a tweet that valuing blockchains solely based on transaction fees is extremely narrow-minded.
[The rest of the translation follows the same approach, maintaining the structure and translating the text while preserving special terms and HTML tags.]The market's perception of Ethereum's value is changing, shifting from a simple "digital oil (source of transaction fees)" to a broader role, and thus its value will require more comprehensive assessment.
Stop Viewing Blockchain Narrowly, L1's Value May Need Reevaluation
This discussion about Ethereum and L1 blockchain value reminds us that price and revenue are just the tip of the iceberg. The analysis by DefiIgnas and fabdarice reveals that true value stems from technology, decentralization, ecosystem expansion, and network effects. In the future, the standards for evaluating L1 value will be more diverse and closer to the critical roles they play in the digital economy.
Risk Warning
Cryptocurrency investment carries high risks, and prices may fluctuate dramatically. You may lose all of your principal. Please carefully assess the risks.