4 月 7 日，美国国家经济委员会主任哈塞特接受福克斯新闻采访。主持人吉米德问及特朗普是否会考虑暂停关税 90 天，哈塞特在作出回答前说了「Yep」（是）这个语气词，然后，说道：「我认为总统将作出他的决定……即使你认为贸易方面会有一些负面影响，那也只占 GDP 的一小部分」。金融博客零对冲解释道，市场似乎把 Yep 错误理解成了同意的意思，但他这个 Yep 只是想表示他听清楚问题了。(金十)

<div><p>4 月 7 日，美国国家经济委员会主任哈塞特接受福克斯新闻采访。主持人吉米德问及特朗普是否会考虑暂停关税 90 天，哈塞特在作出回答前说了「Yep」（是）这个语气词，然后，说道：「我认为总统将作出他的决定……即使你认为贸易方面会有一些负面影响，那也只占 GDP 的一小部分」。金融博客零对冲解释道，市场似乎把 Yep 错误理解成了同意的意思，但他这个 Yep 只是想表示他听清楚问题了。(金十)</p></div>

市场误会特朗普「服软」原委：错把语气词理解为肯定句

On April 7, Hassett, the Director of the National Economic Council, was interviewed by Fox News. When host Jimmy D asked whether Trump would consider suspending tariffs for 90 days, Hassett said "Yep" before responding, and then stated: "I think the president will make his decision... even if you think there will be some negative impacts on trade, that would only account for a small part of GDP." The financial blog Zero Hedge explained that the market seemed to have misinterpreted the "Yep" as agreement, but he was merely indicating that he had heard the question clearly. <金十>

<div><p>On April 7, Hassett, the director of the National Economic Council, was interviewed by Fox News. When host Jimmy D asked whether Trump would consider suspending tariffs for 90 days, Hassett said "Yep" before responding, and then stated: "I think the president will make his decision... even if you think there will be some negative impacts on trade, that would only account for a small part of GDP". The financial blog Zero Hedge explained that the market seemed to have misinterpreted "Yep" as agreement, but he was simply indicating that he had heard the question clearly.</p></div>

The market misunderstood the reason why Trump "surrendered": it mistakenly understood the modal particle as an affirmative sentence

When the sickle wears a suit, the tears of leeks become the best lubricant
<暴跌>
In the crypto world on the early morning of April 14, 2025, a capital script more bloody than "Squid Game" was staged. The MANTRA chain token OM, which focuses on the RWA (Real World Asset tokenization) concept, completed a "faith cleansing plan" worth $5.5 billion in 90 minutes: the price plummeted from $6.15 to a low of $0.37 within 4 hours, a drop of 94%, equivalent to throwing the Shanghai Center Tower from a height of 632 meters into the Huangpu River, while not forgetting to send a leveraged buy the dips guide to the onlooking crowd.
<...>

A 94% plunge in four hours, from faith recharge to faith collapse, revealing the magical realism harvesting script of OM coin

Author: Fairy, ChainCatcher
Editor: TB, ChainCatcher

"This is even worse than LUNA."

In the early morning hours of Beijing time, a sudden plunge left many crypto investors sleepless. The MANTRA token OM plummeted by about 10% within a short hour, then dramatically crashed from $5.21 to $0.50, a staggering drop of 90%.

A wave of shock swept through, with community members sharply commenting: "Many people were still holding OM to earn interest, without even a chance to escape, which is even more brutal than LUNA's..."

The "zero return" trend shocked the market, revealing MANTRA's dark history: market control, legal disputes, and OTC model

In the early morning, the RWA sector project <MANTRA> (OM) dropped by 90% in a short time, plummeting from $6 to $0.5, with a market value evaporation of over $5.5 billion.

Three hours later, the <MANTRA> team released a statement, claiming that the decline was caused by irrational liquidation and was unrelated to the project itself, emphasizing that it was not the team's doing.

Subsequently, OM surged from around $0.5 to $1.2, experiencing a brief sharp rise. According to <Coinglass> data, within just four hours, the OM contract liquidation amount reached $58 million.

The market misunderstood the reason why Trump "surrendered": it mistakenly understood the modal particle as an affirmative sentence

Download app to participate in rewarding events