ChainCatcher 消息，链上分析师余烬在社交平台表示，在以太坊联合创始人 Jeffrey Wilcke 将 105,737 枚 ETH 转进 Kraken 后，又有差不多数量的 ETH (104,746 枚) 通过 7 个地址从 Kraken 提出。这有两种可能： 这是 Jeffrey Wilcke 的操作：将 ETH 转进 Kraken 后又通过多个地址提出，目的是通过交易平台转一手防止后续追踪而非要出售这些 ETH。 这是 Kraken 的风控操作：对于大额价值代币流入交易平台后，通过多个钱包分散存储降低单点风险。

<p>ChainCatcher 消息，链上分析师余烬在社交平台表示，在以太坊联合创始人 Jeffrey Wilcke 将 105,737 枚 ETH 转进 Kraken 后，又有差不多数量的 ETH (104,746 枚) 通过 7 个地址从 Kraken 提出。这有两种可能：</p><ul><li>这是 Jeffrey Wilcke 的操作：将 ETH 转进 Kraken 后又通过多个地址提出，目的是通过交易平台转一手防止后续追踪而非要出售这些 ETH。</li><li>这是 Kraken 的风控操作：对于大额价值代币流入交易平台后，通过多个钱包分散存储降低单点风险。</li></ul>

分析师：Jeffrey Wilcke 将逾 10.5 万枚 ETH 转入 Kraken 后通过新建地址转出或为防追踪，亦可能是平台风控操作

According to ChainCatcher, blockchain analyst Yu Jin stated on social platforms that after Ethereum co-founder Jeffrey Wilcke transferred 105,737 <ETH> into <Kraken>, approximately the same amount of <ETH> (104,746) was withdrawn through 7 addresses from <Kraken>. There are two possible scenarios: 1) This is Jeffrey Wilcke's operation: transferring <ETH> into <Kraken> and then withdrawing through multiple addresses to prevent subsequent tracking, rather than selling these <ETH>. 2) This is <Kraken>'s risk control operation: after large-value tokens flow into the trading platform, they are dispersed and stored across multiple wallets to reduce single-point risk.

<p>According to ChainCatcher, blockchain analyst Yu Jin stated on social platforms that after Ethereum co-founder Jeffrey Wilcke transferred 105,737 ETH into Kraken, approximately the same amount of ETH (104,746) was withdrawn through 7 addresses. There are two possible scenarios:</p><ul><li>This is Jeffrey Wilcke's operation: transferring ETH into Kraken and then withdrawing through multiple addresses to prevent subsequent tracking, rather than selling these ETH.</li><li>This is Kraken's risk control operation: after large-value tokens flow into the trading platform, they are dispersed and stored across multiple wallets to reduce single-point risk.</li></ul>

Analyst: Jeffrey Wilcke transferred more than 105,000 ETH to Kraken and then transferred it out through a new address. This may be to prevent tracking, or it may be a risk control operation of the platform

Today we saw gold, silver, and palladium all hit new highs! Since the correction at the end of October, gold has been trading above the 25-35 day moving average; silver is rising along the four-hour moving average; and palladium is rising along the three-day moving average.
Synchronization: This "synchronized new highs" usually signifies the start of a major trend. Gold provides "stability," silver provides "elasticity," while the addition of palladium indicates a dual surge in industrial and investment demand.
In this clear upward trend, trading volume has not weakened significantly and no bearish structure has emerged. Don't try to short the short at the top; otherwise, you'll end up with...

Market Analysis | Gold, Silver, and Palladium Hit New Highs! How High Can They Go!?

Original text from Prince
Compiled by Odaily Odaily Golem (@web 3_golem)
The failure of fixed-rate lending in the crypto space is not simply because DeFi users reject it. Another reason for its failure is that DeFi protocols designed their credit products using money market assumptions and then deployed them into a liquidity-driven ecosystem; the mismatch between user assumptions and actual capital behavior keeps fixed-rate lending a niche market.
Fixed-rate products are unpopular in the crypto space. Currently, almost all mainstream lending...

Why do DeFi users reject fixed interest rates?

Currently, looking at the daily chart of US stocks, two key signals are needed for confirmation that the market is turning bearish:

- Break below key support: The three major indices must break below the red line.

- Structural reversal: Lower Highs and Lower Lows must appear in the trend.

Currently, the overall trend is still upward, but since no higher highs have been reached, it has essentially been in a consolidation phase since October 30th.

According to Market Pulse data, the index is currently at 50...