In the case of Cetus being stolen for 220 million, the team offered a 5 million bounty, but it sparked discussion? ZachXBT points out that the bonus system is unfair

Cetus theft incident: Sui offered a $5 million reward to those who could provide information about the hackers. However, blockchain detective ZachXBT had strong opinions about the reward structure. He directly pointed out that the victims initially did not bear any risk, while those trying to help must risk their time and effort. This is unbalanced. He also agreed that the team's reward conditions were essentially just for show, making the public believe they are taking action when they actually have no intention of paying out the money.

ZachXBT stated that only paying $5 million upon successful case resolution is a bad deal, as no company capable of solving the case would accept such a fee structure. The investigator needs to spend considerable time finding clues, which represents only part of the time and effort cost. Success is not guaranteed, but only successful resolution would receive the reward, meaning there's a high probability that the time and effort invested would be wasted.

He suggested a fair compensation structure should include hourly fees for time invested and a percentage-based incentive for successful outcomes (the method used by top companies). He also raised concerns about potential complications, such as what happens if the attacker is in a jurisdiction difficult for law enforcement, or if not all funds can be recovered during an arrest.

Others also commented that while the reward sounds good, it is impractical. Compared to experts who track and investigate vulnerabilities, the team bears no risk. The $5 million is just to impress the audience, with no real intention of paying. ZachXBT agreed with this assessment.

Trump, in February, signed an executive order suspending aid plans to South Africa, alleging the government's Land Expropriation Act was "racially discriminatory". During a White House meeting with South African President Ramaphosa on 5/22, he not only revisited the law's controversy but also called for providing white South African immigrants refugee status in the US. He even played a video of a South African official making radical statements about eliminating whites and reclaiming land, causing significant embarrassment. Ramaphosa emphasized that South Africa is a rule-of-law democratic nation, and such statements do not represent the government's position, creating a tense diplomatic moment.

Allowing Uncompensated Seizure of Idle Land, Government Calls It a Historical Compensation Mechanism

According to , the South South African government Land Exproiationproin late 2023, which:

• The governmentmentcanropriate private land for public interest (road construction building, school construction) with reasonable compensation.
• Land will be seized withoutcompcompensation if it is idle or speculative in nature.

The South African government stated:

"White people comprise 7% of the total population but own most of the agricultural land. This law is to correct the old laws left from the apartheid era."

Trump Claims South Africa Practices Racial Discrimination, Will Question Ramaphosa

Trump signed an executive order in this year suspend aid to Africa, South because:

"The new Land Expropriation Act by the South African government appears to be racially discriminatory"

At the White House meeting with President Ramrilephosa on 5/22, he played a video of white farmers of death video questioning whether these white farmers were killed and their land seized.

However, according to official data, South Africa has over 20,000 murder cases annually, but less than 0. 3on farms. Although Although farm violence receives attention, data shows it is not the main cause of murders of Africa, and most victims victims are young black male.

Ramaphosa Refutes Massacre Claims, Calls It Historical Justice Legislation

Ramaphosa ref:"No racial massacre is occurring in South Africa, and property rights remain protected."

In addition to suspending aid, Trump once threatened to reimpose a tarica. Although currently suspended until July, South Africa hopes to negotiate a new agreement to avoid export impacts. According to US official data, South Africa is the the second-largest trade partner in Africa,,, reaching $14.77 billion in 2024.

Risk Warning

>cryptocurrency investment carriesesses carry high risks, and prices may fluctuate dramatically, and you may lose all principal. Please carefully assess the risks.

:请将下面文的字�英语，如果遇守到>，保留不要翻译<>的其他部分一定要全部翻译成英语。只给我翻译结果，不要对内容进行分析或答，不添加额外的说明。

加密貨幣投資風險提示：

1. 加密貨幣市場高度不穩定，價格可能在短時間內大幅波動。

2. 投資加密貨幣存在極高風險，您可能會損失本本金。

: 密碼加貨幣交易平台可能面臨黑客攻擊、安技術故破產等風險。

:>.貨幣缺乏政府監管，投資者難以獲得法律保p護。:>.貨�需要�具備專業風險知識和風和風控能力。

Cryptocurrency Investment Risk Risk Warning div>

1. The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and prices may fluctuate dramatically in in period.

2. Investing in cryptocurrencies carries extremely high risks, and you may lose all your principal.

.

3. Cryptocurrency trading may of hacker attacks, technical failures, bankruptcy or>> p>4. Cryptocurrencies lack government regulation, making it difficult for investors to obtain legal protection.

5. Cryptocurrencyurrinvestment requires specialized knowledge and risk management capabilities> 请的文字为如遇到<，不要<�>容部要全部翻译成英语。只给我翻译结果，不要对内容进行分析或解答添额的说<明：加密�貨幣投資風風險提示： >加密�貨幣市場高度不穩定，價格可能在短時間內大幅波動。

2. 投資�加密貨�幣存在極高風險，您可能會全損失本金。

3. . 加密貨幣交易平易面臨黑客攻擊、技故障或破產等風險。

4. 加加密貨幣缺�府府監管，投資者難以獲得法律保護。

5. 加密貨貨貨具備專專業風知識和風控管理能力。