This article is machine translated
Show original
Here's the translation:
Understanding Long-Termism
Long-termism is definitely correct in the long run
The core point is when to start long-termism
It should be after you have completed your first pot of gold in wealth accumulation
Life is like a play, a game of drama
Ordinary people start at level 1 and slowly level up
Buffett started at max level, with his father being a congressman
He bought stocks at 11, owned over 200 acres of land at 15
He also did a lot of early speculative trading
Selling chewing gum, delivering newspapers, renting pinball machines, etc.
These were all processes of accumulating original capital
In recent years, Duan Yongping has only told everyone to buy Apple/Moutai/Tencent
Essentially, these are not wrong
At least ordinary people won't lose money buying these stocks long-term
The key is how much principal you have and which era you were born in
It's fine to buy Apple with 100 million and collect dividends
But with just 10,000 in principal, buying Apple now? Don't be ridiculous
The Xiaobawang game console and Bubugao VCD that Master Duan did early on
Do these count as long-termism?
No, in Lei Jun's words, this is called "going with the trend"
So first complete the accumulation of original wealth
Then you are qualified to start long-termism
The times are different now
Today's global capitalized monopoly market
In the past, ordinary people could buy Apple and Tesla with a 10 billion market value, today SpaceX and OpenAI are worth hundreds of billions before even going public, how can this game be played?
Finally, to summarize: Long-termism is still correct
But it depends on each person's life progress
For example, James should do long-termism after PEPE
Unfortunately, he didn't.

冰蛙
@Ice_Frog666666
06-01
去年在新加坡,我和嗯哼有过非常真诚的深夜交流。
他那时候还有些迷茫,我告诉他我个人关于长期主义、关于做人做事的理解,我真心希望,自己的一点经验能帮到他,也期待他走得更远。 x.com/ice_frog666666…

That’s right, Buffett’s advice to small funds is that there are many stocks with smaller market capitalizations to choose from. To put it bluntly, his big funds cannot participate in things with bigger odds, such as the crypto.
I remember he said in a video before: well, if I only have 1M now, the annual return can be much higher than it is now
From Twitter
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments
Share





