Jupiter DAO members criticize project team for having too much voting power
This article is machine translated
Show original
Planet Daily News: A controversy has emerged regarding the DAO governance structure of Solana ecosystem exchange Jupiter, with an anonymous member named Thisisfun pointing out that the team excessively influences voting results and decentralized governance structure through their held JUP governance tokens (representing 20% of total supply). Jupiter co-founder Ming Ng responded in the forum, stating that two founders will not participate in voting, but the third anonymous founder still retains voting rights. It is reported that in the most recent Jupiter proposal, a single team wallet's voting proportion reached 4.5%. (DL News)
Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments
Share





