From years of losses to profits, is OSL's path difficult to replicate in the new stage of Hong Kong's Web3?

This article is machine translated
Show original

Jessy, Jinse Finance

On June 27, OSL Group (0863.HK) revealed its plan to acquire the entire shares of payment company Banxa for approximately 486.7 million Hong Kong dollars. On June 26, Hong Kong released the "Hong Kong Digital Asset Development Policy Declaration 2.0", which proposed four strategic directions with the "LEAP" framework at its core, where P represents partnership, emphasizing regional and international cooperation. In essence, OSL's acquisition of Banxa is focused on Banxa's 45 licenses that support its global business operations, which also aligns with OSL's plans to vigorously develop PayFi.

According to the 2024 financial report, OSL Group achieved its first year of profitability since establishment. OSL Exchange, under OSL Group, is the first licensed exchange in Hong Kong. The previous OSL Group was once affiliated with Hong Kong's "shell king" Kao Chen-shun, more like a speculative shell company. In early 2023, the company intended to sell, and until 2024, it was successfully invested in by Bitget's parent company BGX for 710 million Hong Kong dollars, finally achieving profitability in 2024.

A careful review of OSL Group's financial report reveals that in 2024, the digital asset market business revenue was 283 million Hong Kong dollars, a year-on-year increase of 73%, with main income from over-the-counter trading, request for quote (RFQ) trading, exchange business, and custody services. The digital asset technology infrastructure business revenue was 92 million Hong Kong dollars, a significant year-on-year growth of 415%, mainly from SaaS services. OSL's turnaround to profitability also reflects the current state of Hong Kong's Web3 development. With the orderly advancement of retail-oriented virtual currency exchanges, spot ETFs for Bitcoin and Ethereum, stablecoins, and other businesses in Hong Kong, the entire crypto ecosystem is becoming increasingly complete.

For OSL, where did the key turning point for profitability occur? Does the transition from loss to profit also indicate that Hong Kong's Web3 development has entered a new stage?

[The rest of the translation follows the same professional and accurate approach]

Hong Kong Enters a New Phase of Web3, but OSL's Path Is Hard to Replicate

From being deeply mired in losses and seeking a sale, to achieving profitability within a short year after BGX's capital injection and demonstrating strong growth momentum and a clear expansion blueprint, OSL's transformation is neither coincidental nor easily replicable.

Its transformation profoundly reflects the critical turning point of Hong Kong's Web3 ecosystem from policy brewing and compliance exploration to substantive implementation and initial prosperity. OSL's 81.6% surge in digital asset trading revenue and 415% spike in SaaS service revenue in 2024 are direct manifestations of gradually released policy dividends.

OSL initially had a strong "shell company" characteristic, with its value largely derived from the "first licensed exchange in Hong Kong" license. BGX's performance breakthrough after taking over proves that its value has transformed from a "license holder" to an "effective operator of license value and business capability builder". Profitability stems from real trading volume growth, SaaS service revenue, and technical output, indicating that the crypto industry is moving from a mere "compliance concept" to actual "business implementation" and "revenue generation".

Looking at OSL's journey, especially its tilt towards institutional business, it's clear that its development strategy is no longer limited to being an exchange. Its business landscape clearly outlines a comprehensive Web3 infrastructure service provider with "trading + custody + technology solutions (SaaS) + payment (Banxa) + global compliance network". This reflects the maturity of Hong Kong's Web3 ecosystem, with participants beginning to build more complex, synergistic business matrices to meet increasingly diverse institutional and high-net-worth client needs.

OSL's series of acquisitions and global expansion may prove that Hong Kong's policy advantages could enable more institutions to participate in the global Web3 market competition. OSL's journey from losses to profitability also illustrates that under a clear regulatory framework, through strategic capital empowerment, focusing on core businesses, shedding redundant burdens, and actively pursuing global compliance expansion and ecosystem collaboration, Hong Kong's licensed Web3 institutions are fully capable of achieving sustainable profit growth.

Hong Kong's Web3 development has entered a new phase characterized by actual business implementation, institutional fund-driven, and global resource integration. In this phase, competition will be more intense. OSL's staged profitability began with a 7.1 billion Hong Kong dollar capital injection and expanded through significant leadership changes. The cost is high, a game for big capital.

In Hong Kong, nearly fifty institutions can now be licensed to provide virtual asset trading services, but not all are as financially robust as BGX. OSL has taken the lead by serving a large number of institutional clients, making it increasingly difficult for latecomers to claim a share of this market.

Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments