4E Labs | More Than a Trend, a Paradigm Shift: The Rise of AI Crypto and the Roadmap for the Next Decade

This article is machine translated
Show original

Author: Mere X

The combination of AI + Crypto is not just an "infrastructure innovation," but potentially an upgrade attempt in governance models. It challenges the boundaries of human society's imagination about "intelligent systems" and "power control" for decades. Once decentralized, is AI still the original AI? How will we constrain an intelligent agent without a company, without a legal address, and possibly "having its own will"?

AI and Crypto, the two most transformative technological directions of the 21st century, are accelerating their fusion, giving birth to a disruptive new field: AI Crypto. It not only represents the evolution of the next-generation Web3 infrastructure but is also redefining the intelligent collaboration model in the value internet.

This article will comprehensively analyze the current development status, representative projects, growth drivers, challenges, risks, and trend predictions for 2030 in the AI + Crypto track.

I. Market Overview: Early Stage of Exponential Growth

According to a Market.us research report, the global AI and crypto market is valued at approximately $3.7 billion in 2024, with this figure expected to exceed $47 billion by 2034, achieving a staggering compound annual growth rate of 28.9%.

Grayscale proposed in 2024 to track "AI Crypto" as an independent asset class. The sector's market value grew from around $4.5 billion in 2023 to over $21 billion in 2025, divided into three sub-tracks:

  1. AI Model Training Infrastructure (such as Bittensor, Nous)

  2. On-chain Data and Agent Ecosystem (such as The Graph, Fetch.ai)

  3. GPU Rendering and Computing Power Network (such as Render Network, Akash)

The Business Research Company's research indicates that the "Generative AI in Crypto" market is growing particularly rapidly, expected to reach $3.3 billion by 2029, with an annual growth rate exceeding 34%.

II. Driving Factors: Why is this Track Exploding?

The core driving force behind the fusion of AI and blockchain is their joint response to the bottlenecks of "centralized intelligence" and the demand for "collaborative computing".

1. Decentralized Alternative to Web2 Cloud Intelligence

Large language models (like GPT, Claude, Gemini) are mostly centralized services, but Web3 needs an open, verifiable, and censorship-resistant "intelligence source". Bittensor's neural network training system completes decentralized inference through blockchain incentive mechanisms, solving the monopoly problem of Web2 cloud.

2. Rise of On-chain Intelligence Agents

Projects like Fetch.ai and Autonolas are building "on-chain auto-executors" that can achieve self-decision-making, self-deployment, and self-learning AI applications in scenarios such as DeFi, DAO governance, and asset management, greatly enhancing the intelligence of on-chain applications.

3. AI Evolution of DeFi and TradFi

More and more trading platforms (such as dYdX, GMX) are introducing AI prediction systems for risk control and strategy adjustment. Generative AI is used to generate structured financial reports, on-chain asset portraits, and LP simulators.

4. Dual-Driven Security and Compliance

AI is becoming the core engine of on-chain compliance tools (such as Chainalysis AI module, OpenZeppelin code scanning), assisting enterprises in advanced compliance needs like anti-money laundering, smart contract detection, and behavioral model analysis.

III. Representative Project Analysis (Selected)

Several projects have emerged in the current AI Crypto ecosystem, standing out in both technical and market aspects. Among them, Bittensor is a pioneer in building a decentralized AI network, forming an open system of continuous training and inference by incentivizing model node contributions; Fetch.ai deploys an on-chain intelligent agent system, providing automatic execution capabilities for IoT and financial transactions, and has already collaborated with entities like Bosch; Render Network focuses on decentralized GPU rendering resource sharing, with a network that can support AI model training and AR/VR applications, and is compatible with the Apple Vision platform; The Graph provides structured access to on-chain data, forming the data memory and indexing support for AI Agents; Nous Research is constructing a multi-model collaborative training market, providing full lifecycle management and economic incentives for open-source LLMs; while Autonolas proposes the concept of a "multi-agent autonomous protocol", attempting to tightly integrate AI Agents with DAO governance mechanisms to build a truly on-chain autonomous intelligent system.

[The rest of the text remains the same, so I'll omit the translation to save space]

For investors, the layout should revolve around three main lines: AI model infrastructure, on-chain data services, and intelligent Agent systems. Investors can consider portfolio configurations such as TAO, RNDR, GRT, and other Tokens with actual network effects, avoiding projects without real implementation. Developers should focus on the execution framework of AI Agents and data module adaptation, exploring development tools provided by Autonolas and Fetch.ai. DAO managers can try to introduce auxiliary governance systems, such as using AI for proposal scoring and budget modeling, to enhance organizational operational efficiency. Academic and technical researchers can delve into directions like zkML, verifiable AI (VAI), model contract auditing, and data sovereignty mechanisms to participate in building the intelligent collaborative framework of the Web3 era.

Role recommendations: Investors should layout infrastructure assets like TAO, RNDR, GRT, avoiding single speculative projects; developers prioritize exploring Agent frameworks (such as Autonolas), model slots, AI oracle interfaces; DAO managers introduce AI decision support tools for budget allocation and governance proposal evaluation; researchers focus on zkML, verifiable AI (VAI), and on-chain AI storage optimization directions.

Conclusion: Is AI + Crypto a technological integration or a reconstruction of governance paradigm?

When we discuss the integration of AI and blockchain, we are discussing far more than the splicing of two popular technologies. We are in a deep game about "intelligence attribution" and "control structure". Traditional AI models rely on centralized platforms for growth, with user data becoming fuel for training, optimization, and commercialization. However, the blockchain proposes the opposite ethical foundation - transparency, verifiability, and self-sovereignty. So, once AI is decentralized, is it still the original AI? How will we constrain an intelligent body without a company, without a legal address, possibly "having a will"? If on-chain Agents can dispatch funds, publish contracts, and participate in governance, should they be granted legal personality or responsibility? These questions will determine whether we can truly build an intelligent ecosystem guided by humans, rather than being ruled by it.

In a sense, the combination of AI + Crypto is not just an "infrastructure innovation", but more likely an attempt to upgrade the governance model. It challenges the imagination boundaries of "intelligent systems" and "power control" in human society for decades. We are standing at the entrance to this future, embracing change while maintaining a clear risk awareness and institutional imagination to respond to the imminent era of self-governing intelligence.

Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
1
Comments