Vitalik Buterin, addressing the "zero space" governance emphasized in the EU's Digital Services Act, points out that viewing certain speech or goods as objects to be completely eradicated is essentially an anti-pluralistic and anti-inclusive governance impulse. When dealing with subjective issues involving well-intentioned disagreements, this approach easily leads to the use of a technocratic system to forcibly define the boundaries of public discourse. He emphasizes that free societies do not aim to eliminate controversial content, but rather to prevent it from being systematically amplified and dominating public discussion under the influence of platform algorithms and incentive mechanisms.
Vitalik Buterin criticizes the EU's "zero space" governance: it should not eliminate controversial content, but rather limit algorithmic amplification.
This article is machine translated
Show original
Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments
Share





