The world itself is a vast goldmine. Trump needs to constantly demonstrate his abilities to the American people, ensuring voters continue to cast their ballots for him. Similarly, the paths to projects we participate in in the crypto market are already pre-designed. How users participate, how they profit, and how they cooperate to boost data and metrics on larger exchanges are essentially a sophisticated behavioral guidance system. Therefore, when platforms start focusing solely on settlement metrics and users only on exit certainty, project teams have very limited options. They can only concentrate their resources on the stages most easily seen by platforms and the market—a rational outcome under the current incentive structure. The numerous successful cases mentioned in the text, whether platform-based entry points, UGC community mobilization, or revenue-generating TVL designs, are essentially doing the same thing: compressing users' cognitive costs and transforming participation into a low-thinking, high-certainty choice. However, these methods often rely on strong entry points, strong endorsements, and abundant resources. When participating, it's more important to understand where we stand in this game theory structure. twitter.com/EnHeng456/status/2...