Depin has an embarrassing problem: In bull markets, everyone rejoices and makes a fortune. However, in bear markets, because projects are highly data-driven, their true colors are revealed, and everything looks terrible. I think the reason is simple: the token economics design is flawed. It can't adjust token issuance based on market conditions, user volume, and fixed large issuances, which aren't apparent in bull markets. But in bear markets, it's a mountain, suffocating everyone. What to do? We can't just sit and wait to die. @ionet came up with an idea: an IDE (Incentive Dynamic Engine). My understanding is that its core purpose is to solve this inherent weakness of being "dependent on market conditions." It attempts to transform the rigid "fixed salary" into a performance system that is accountable for results. Specifically, it has three points: 1. It introduces a "sustainability ratio," linking the token issuance to the network's actual revenue. Incentives only circulate if real AI clients rent computing power and pay for it. 2. It provides miners with a "guaranteed minimum" mechanism (denominated in USD). The IDE anchors the USD revenue of suppliers through a dual-database mechanism. When the price of the coin is low, the system will automatically adjust to ensure that miners still receive relatively stable USD returns, preventing a large-scale withdrawal of miners during a bear market. 3. Promote deflation. When the model's network revenue increases, IDE will initiate buybacks and burns. ➡️I think this is definitely a positive development $IO, everyone can pay attention to the token. Then, if this system can work, it will be a major positive for Depin's narrative. It's equivalent to shifting from the previous "Ponzi scheme" to "revenue-driven". It has reference and learning value for all projects in this sector.