Him once again demonstrated through his actions that the amount of capital one possesses determines the amount of resources one can acquire. For a stock to take off, its price structure must be reasonable, requiring multiple waves of capital relay. This is similar to the movie "Goldfinger," where each price level sees a relay of buying and selling. Speaking of last year's bull market, why were there so many stocks reaching hundreds of millions in price? A key factor was the reasonableness of their price structure and the subsequent relay of capital. Many project teams didn't directly drive up the price with their own funds; instead, they carefully controlled the initial capital at the bottom, and at opportune moments, used OTC trading to leverage KOL funds to hold resistance levels or trigger breakouts, generating FOMO and copy trading, thus creating one phenomenal investment after another. A common practice, for example, is that if the trading volume is 10M, the agreement with the OTC platform is 50,000 USDT for 1% of the tokens. The OTC platform directly buys 50,000 USDT at market price. Regardless of how many tokens are purchased, the project team transfers the remaining tokens to the OTC platform to complete the 1% allocation. This large volume of OTC transactions directly injects significant buying power into the pool, raising the ceiling for the target token. Therefore, there exists a group of OTC intermediaries who control the true flow of market funds. When liquidity is high, they act as "turbochargers" on the price chart. So, back to the point: are metrics like single-address holdings, tethering ratios, and small wallets useful? They might be useful, or they might not.