This article is machine translated
Show original
Warsh is a relatively universally acceptable candidate. He has a strong personality, a good reputation in the market, and is a pragmatist. He should be relatively cooperative with Trump initially, but it's hard to say what will happen once he's established. However, as long as he can cooperate to win the midterm elections, that's fine. If Trump wins, there's no fear of him going against Trump's wishes.
Hassett is far too loyal, which would lead to market scrutiny regarding the Fed's independence. Therefore, Trump has compromised to some extent and cannot act arbitrarily.
Trump's decision not to impulsively choose Hassett shows that he still respects the power of the financial markets. Warsh is a respectable figure acceptable to Wall Street: a Morgan Stanley alumnus, a Stanford graduate, a former Fed governor, and his father-in-law is from the Estée Lauder family (a top-tier wealthy circle). This makes Wall Street feel that he is a "trustworthy ally" who won't cause trouble.

麦通MSX
@MSX_CN
01-30
沃什问鼎美联储主席似乎胜券在握?
零秒猜出普子选人最在意的是_______🤪 x.com/MSX_CN/status/…
It seems like Powell might genuinely be clinging to his position as a board member, especially with Hassett. As for Walsh, Powell can probably rest in peace now. 🤣
From Twitter
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments
Share
Relevant content





