From a socioeconomic perspective, Bitcoin (BTC) is a black hole of a new civilization, a new paradigm completely separate from past economic models. BTC's value energy comes from its ability to drain old human values ​​(similar to a black hole). This value black hole in BTC operates under a different set of cosmic rules. Our old socioeconomic system operates through organized, centralized planning. BTC's consensus, however, arises from decentralized, emergent game theory. Therefore, established figures like Buffett and Munger, clinging to the old order, cannot provide a clear interpretation of BTC. The reason is as revealed by Gödel's incompleteness theorems: any logical system is incomplete, always containing internal logical flaws that create unpredictable problems. This is especially true when the logic originates from outside the system itself. This can be compared to: the old centralized planned economy model is like Euclidean plane geometry. Centralized planning is analogous to the parallel postulate (two parallel lines do not intersect). But once we transcend this parallel assumption, we can see a larger and more comprehensive world. Just like the peer-to-peer decentralized consensus mechanism brought about by Bitcoin, it breaks away from the previously established parallel axiom. This is also why Munger/Buffett's dominant judgment in the "Euclidean plane" geometry completely fails in the "non-Euclidean geometry" domain.