๐ฅ๐ข๐ฆ ๐ฎ (๐ฅ๐ผ๐ฏ๐ผ๐ ๐ข๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐บ ๐ฎ) ๐ข๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ROS 2 is middleware for building robot software. It handles message-passing between processes, node discovery, and data serialization - the infrastructure layer so you don't write TCP sockets yourself. Key difference from ROS 1? ROS 1 used a custom TCP protocol. ROS 2 uses DDS (Data Distribution Service) - a standard that supports QoS policies, security, and deterministic communication timing. A factory arm needs guaranteed 1ms response times. ROS 1 couldn't promise that. ROS 2 can. How does it differ from alternatives? vs writing custom: you get pub/sub, service calls, parameter servers, lifecycle management out of box. Building this takes teams 6-12 months. vs proprietary frameworks (ABB RobotStudio, KUKA KRL): ROS 2 is hardware-agnostic. The same code runs on different robot brands. And you may know these big guys that already use ROS 2: โค Bosch: warehouse robots (2,000+ units deployed); โค NASA: VIPER lunar rover; โค Tier IV: Autoware autonomous driving stack (production vehicles in Japan); โค Amazon: some Proteus warehouse robots; โค BMW, Toyota: R&D and production line automation. Adoption increased 3x from ROS 1 to ROS 2 in industrial settings (2019-2024), per Open Robotics' survey of 3,500 developers.

From Twitter
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments
Share
Relevant content






