Predict Profit-Gathering Guide (I've written too much analysis already, so I'm too lazy to write another one) Project Fundamentals Analysis: x.com/maid_crypto/status/20175...… Practical Guide 2 + Profit-Gathering Script x.com/maid_crypto/status/20253...… Sharing: Why I Only Participate in @predictdotfun Prediction Markets Besides Polymarket BSC's Three Fools Opinion focuses on relationships, targeting Aster. Relationship coins are the most disgusting narrative in BSC, and have already been heavily suppressed by the top leader. Probable, backed by Pancake, focuses on zero fees, targeting Lighter. Zero fees make your points worthless in my eyes. Predict focuses on automatic interest generation on idle funds, targeting StandX. Regardless of what those KOLs say, I'm just talking about the product. BSC's orthodoxy is StandX. The orthodox prediction market is Predict. Everyone else is a rebel, here to profit from BSC, not to support it. I don't know how StandX and Predict, which are relatively at the bottom, will ultimately prevail, but I firmly believe that the world is black and white. If doing the right thing leads to good results, then these two projects will win. Meanwhile, Predict is also the least friendly to profit-taking among the three BSC projects. It almost never gives weight to end-of-day trading. Points are only given to real users (placed orders + orders placed during trending events). Some say that with the project merger, Probale's points are not worthwhile. I think that's completely wrong. Probale's points are zero-fee and therefore not valuable, while Predict's points are earned by placing orders with real money. Are there any downsides to Predict? Yes, its product operation is not high-level. Its opening strategy is not sophisticated. Its order book lacks appeal. It hasn't opened an order book for prediction market gems like Musk tweeting. Its trading volume is the lowest among the three projects, and its UI is not sophisticated. These are objective realities. I understand they've spent a lot of time improving it, generating interest on idle assets, and other things that are not immediately obvious to end-users. For example, let me mention Opinion's oracle—a haphazard, centralized one. This alone shows that the project isn't intended for long-term sustainability. Predict uses a hybrid mechanism similar to Polymarket's core mechanism: the UMAL optimistic oracle, an original AI challenge, and manual verification. This shows that the project is intended for long-term sustainability. Furthermore, some projects have been running for so long, only to launch and then immediately fleece investors. They haven't even implemented an oracle—how can they not be scammers? It's like a soldier going into battle without a gun.