So @reppo V1 was a proof of concept. V2 is a different protocol. Most people tracking $REPPO still don't understand what actually changed. Here's the full breakdown. V1 used commit-reveal voting. You submitted a hidden vote in phase one and had to come back to reveal it in phase two. Sounds fine in theory. In practice, a huge chunk of voters never completed the reveal. Your vote simply didn't count. V2 removes this entirely. Now every vote is visible in real time. To stop last-minute pile-ons, V2 adds linear decay: ➜ Vote at hour 0: full power ➜ Vote at hour 24: half power ➜ Vote at hour 48: nearly zero Early conviction gets rewarded. Late manipulation gets penalised. That's a real mechanic, not just a rule. V1 also only had positive voting. You could support a Pod but you couldn't push back on garbage. V2 adds negative voting. If a Pod ends the 48-hour epoch with negative net votes, the publisher gets nothing. Those emissions get redistributed to Pods that actually passed. Disagreement is now a signal, not just noise. Does that matter for AI training data? It absolutely does. Knowing what experts rejected is as useful as knowing what they approved. Then there's Datanet creation. V1 was centrally managed. V2 is fully self-serve. You pay 10,000 to 20,000 $REPPO, the protocol mints you a Datanet NFT. You own it. You control the publishing fee, the voter/publisher split, and the emission pool. You can sell the NFT if the Datanet generates real revenue. V2 also lets Datanet owners seed emissions in any token, not just $REPPO. Seed in non-REPPO and you pay a tax. Seed in $REPPO and you pay nothing. That tax flows to the treasury for operations and buybacks. Last thing: V2 introduces EVOF, Economic Value of Feedback. It measures how much capital-backed conviction sits behind a Datanet's curated data. Not just how many votes, but the quality and depth of participation behind them. V1 asked people to trust the process. V2 gives you the numbers to verify it yourself. What part of this do you think the market has most underpriced? And which of these changes do you think actually moves the needle on data quality?

$REPPO is building fullstack