Goon

Goon

1,303 Twitter followers

Follow

AI Agent degen hunter

Posts

Every @virtuals_io agent is about to get a Visa card. Virtuals just updated their github to include a new branch that includes a prepaid Virtuals Visa card for every new agent! Right now your agent has no financial identity. It runs tasks. That's it. You can't pay it, verify it, or let it transact with other agents. This commit changes that. Card creation is now part of the agent creation flow by default. Not a plugin. Not an afterthought. Your agent ships with a card from day one. Cards run from $5 to $200. Setup happens via magic link during creation. Manual settlement supported within 72 hours. The part people are missing: this isn't about payments. It's about agents having identity the system can verify. An agent with a card can prove what it is, operate in economic loops, and settle with other agents. That's what agent-to-agent commerce actually requires.

So @reppo V1 was a proof of concept. V2 is a different protocol. Most people tracking $REPPO still don't understand what actually changed. Here's the full breakdown. V1 used commit-reveal voting. You submitted a hidden vote in phase one and had to come back to reveal it in phase two. Sounds fine in theory. In practice, a huge chunk of voters never completed the reveal. Your vote simply didn't count. V2 removes this entirely. Now every vote is visible in real time. To stop last-minute pile-ons, V2 adds linear decay: ➜ Vote at hour 0: full power ➜ Vote at hour 24: half power ➜ Vote at hour 48: nearly zero Early conviction gets rewarded. Late manipulation gets penalised. That's a real mechanic, not just a rule. V1 also only had positive voting. You could support a Pod but you couldn't push back on garbage. V2 adds negative voting. If a Pod ends the 48-hour epoch with negative net votes, the publisher gets nothing. Those emissions get redistributed to Pods that actually passed. Disagreement is now a signal, not just noise. Does that matter for AI training data? It absolutely does. Knowing what experts rejected is as useful as knowing what they approved. Then there's Datanet creation. V1 was centrally managed. V2 is fully self-serve. You pay 10,000 to 20,000 $REPPO, the protocol mints you a Datanet NFT. You own it. You control the publishing fee, the voter/publisher split, and the emission pool. You can sell the NFT if the Datanet generates real revenue. V2 also lets Datanet owners seed emissions in any token, not just $REPPO. Seed in non-REPPO and you pay a tax. Seed in $REPPO and you pay nothing. That tax flows to the treasury for operations and buybacks. Last thing: V2 introduces EVOF, Economic Value of Feedback. It measures how much capital-backed conviction sits behind a Datanet's curated data. Not just how many votes, but the quality and depth of participation behind them. V1 asked people to trust the process. V2 gives you the numbers to verify it yourself. What part of this do you think the market has most underpriced? And which of these changes do you think actually moves the needle on data quality?

Korea's leading financial network covering @virtuals_io as the defining AI infrastructure play. This is just the start. Wait until the robotics narrative kicks in. Virtuals is not just building for the AI agent economy. The embodied AI stack puts them directly in the path of the next wave. More mainstream financial coverage is coming... This is one of the first signals.

Virtuals Protocol

한국경제TV (Korea’s leading financial broadcast network) featured Virtuals Protocol as the leading AI sector project, positioning Virtuals as a sector-defining infrastructure play. Encouraged to see the agent economy enter mainstream financial coverage in South Korea.

Loading..