The US government wastes a lot of unnecessary money
DOGE previously stated that the US government's use of funds is quite ridiculous, and listed some examples of the government's "absurd" use of funds, such as:
- Purchasing $28 million in copyright for "green camouflage pattern" designs for the Afghan National Army's uniforms.
- The National Institutes of Health (NIH) spent $5 million to help fashionable people quit smoking.
- Spending $510,000 in public funds to study how heroin affects the sexual behavior of Japanese quails.
- The NIH spent $3 million observing hamsters fighting.
- Spending $170 million annually to maintain a mosquito facility.
- Spending $1 million to print official documents that no one wants to read.
- Spending $860,000 annually to pay for warehouse management fees to maintain some useless waste.
- Spending $500,000 to build a pancake house?
- Spending over $80 million to go door-to-door promoting the Super Bowl.
Don't just fear mistakes, focus on the potential of small-scale experiments
Vitalik pointed out that when the government uses funds, a small portion of the projects are magnified and criticized on social media due to mistakes. However, Vitalik believes that such mistakes only account for a very small proportion of the overall expenditure. If the government pursues "zero mistakes" too much, it will not only abandon many high-return innovation projects, but also allow truly inefficient and "superficial" projects to continue to exist without being reviewed.
Learn from the venture capital model to pursue high returns and avoid large projects becoming sunk costs
Vitalik advocates that the government should adopt a venture capital (VC) strategy for small public funding projects, which is to allow mistakes, with the goal of capturing opportunities with potential 1000-fold value. He gave the example that the venture capital world is full of "failed" investments, but only a few successful cases can have a huge impact. He believes that this model is also applicable to the management of public funds allocation.
Vitalik emphasizes that the government should focus its efforts on large-scale funding projects, such as national infrastructure or major policies, to avoid unnecessary resource waste and long-term sunk costs. For small-scale pilot projects, the government should accept a certain degree of failure risk and focus on stimulating innovation development.