Why do you like 0G? ┈┈➤ Let's talk about non-technical things first╰┈⯈Scheming Boy After Kait*'s revision, the project pages are divided into categories. 0G is an AI Layer 1 project that was originally categorized as AI. However, due to feedback from the 0G project owner, it was moved to the L0/L1 tier. Because 0G's name begins with "0," 0G is the first project on Kait*. I guess the name 0G was chosen with some intention. ╰┈⯈Romantic expression 0G released an ecosystem map using the image of an iceberg, though perhaps few people grasped its meaning. By using the iceberg, 0G wanted to convey that what the world sees is only the tip of the 0G iceberg. Beneath the iceberg lies a vast infrastructure. Next, Brother Feng will continue to talk about 0G infrastructure. ┈┈➤0G is equivalent to the combination of multiple project functions 0G= Bittensor +Arweave+Filecoin +Decentralized AI computing power market+ (FetchAI will be launched in the future) ◆0G Chain, similar in function to Bittensor, is used for the coordination and incentive layers of AI. ◆0G Storage, similar in function to Arweave, is a permanent storage used for storing AI data, etc. ◆0G DA, similar to Filecoin in function, non-permanent storage, used for DA. 0G Marketplace, similar in function to Fetch.ai Of course, they are similar only in function, while the specific technical principles are completely different. ╰┈⯈0G Chain vs Bittensor Bittensor is based on Polkadot's Substrate, while 0G is based on the Cosmos SDK. Both blockchains offer technical optimizations and innovations. However, 0G can store AI data and even AI models on decentralized storage, something Bittensor lacks. In terms of infrastructure, 0G is superior to Bittensor. However, in terms of the future of the AI ​​ecosystem, it's not certain that 0G will surpass Bittensor, as this isn't entirely dependent on technical factors. However, we can continue to wait and see. ╰┈⯈0G Storage vs Arweave One similarity between 0G Storage and Arweave is that both are designed to facilitate reads. 0G Storage's KV layer and Arweave's cache design both improve data read efficiency. The key difference between 0G Storage and Arweave lies in their file storage structures. 0G Storage uses a two-layered architecture of blockchain and storage. Arweave, on the other hand, integrates file storage and blockchain, packaging files into blocks like data within them. The different file storage structures lead to two performance differences: First, due to Arweave's storage structure, it's not well-suited for storing large files. It's hard to imagine a single block storing a 1GB or larger file. Storing large files with Arweave requires client-side tools to split the file into smaller chunks before storing them in Arweave. This is somewhat cumbersome for users. However, 0G Storage supports larger files. 0G Storage inherently divides files into smaller chunks for storage, eliminating the need for additional tools. Secondly, due to Arweave's storage structure, it needs to store a copy of the stored files on all nodes, which leads to excessive redundancy. 0G Storage divides the file into several fragments and adds several redundant fragments, thus ensuring that the file will not be lost with a certain probability and reducing redundancy. ╰┈⯈0G DA vs Filecoin The technology of 0G DA and 0G Storage is the same, except that there is an additional storage time parameter, which is used to determine the storage duration of files. Filecoin divides files into fixed-size segments, performs computations on them, and then stores them in Filecoin sectors. Users can choose how many copies to store. If only one copy is stored, it might only be stored on one node. The segmentation and computation are for verification purposes. The differences between 0G DA and Filecoin include: First, Filecoin fragments a file and can store only one copy. If a node in this copy fails, the file cannot be fully restored. 0G DA/0G Storage, however, uses an erasure coding algorithm, ensuring complete file availability even if 33% of the nodes fail. Therefore, Filecoin is fundamentally incapable of DA, but 0G DA is well suited. Second, Filecoin lacks a cache design that facilitates reading. However, the KV layer of 0G DA/0G Storage stores key data in the form of KV, which allows for fast data reading. ┈┈➤Written at the end 0G has developed infrastructure technologies more suitable for AI applications, including blockchain, decentralized storage, and computing power markets. The breadth of this AI infrastructure exceeds that of any existing AI ecosystem. As a more comprehensive and complete infrastructure layer, 0G can serve a wide range of applications beyond AI applications. It also includes providing third-party modular DA services for the Rollup Layer 2 ecosystem, decentralized file storage, and many other areas. Compared to Arweave, 0G Storage offers higher space efficiency and performance. Compared to Filecoin, 0G DA/0G Storage offers superior data availability, time efficiency, and performance. Infrastructure determines the lower limit of the ecology. Poor technical infrastructure will lead to a low starting point for the ecology. On the other hand, a project like 0G, with a relatively complete infrastructure layer and strong technical capabilities, has a strong ecosystem foundation. Even before the mainnet launch, it has already established ecosystem partnerships with over 100 projects. Of course, how high the ecosystem can develop depends on factors such as the continuous optimization of subsequent technologies and ecological operations. I know it's too late to roll up 0G now, but I have learned a lot from this project, so I will continue to learn and write. I have said it before, I am not a liar:) twitter.com/blockTVBee/status/...

Good morning, Sister Bee

TGE is so slow.

This is almost tge

It should be 10 minutes after I posted the message.