火星财经消息，据 Arkham 数据，在 22:58，150.02 枚 BTC（价值约 1328.7 万美元）从一匿名地址（bc1qq8...开头）转出至另一匿名地址（bc1qn6...开头）。随后，该地址将部分 BTC（0.00242 枚）转移至 Coinbase。

<div>火星财经消息，据 Arkham 数据，在 22:58，150.02 枚 BTC（价值约 1328.7 万美元）从一匿名地址（bc1qq8...开头）转出至另一匿名地址（bc1qn6...开头）。随后，该地址将部分 BTC（0.00242 枚）转移至 Coinbase。</div>

数据：150.02 枚 BTC 从匿名地址转出，经中转后流入 Coinbase

According to Mars Finance, citing Arkham data, at 22:58, 150.02 BTC (worth approximately $13.287 million) were transferred from one anonymous address (starting with bc1qq8...) to another anonymous address (starting with bc1qn6...). Subsequently, this address transferred some of the BTC (0.00242 BTC) to Coinbase.

<div>According to Mars Finance, citing Arkham data, at 22:58, 150.02 BTC (worth approximately $13.287 million) were transferred from one anonymous address (starting with bc1qq8...) to another anonymous address (starting with bc1qn6...). Subsequently, this address transferred a portion of the BTC (0.00242 BTC) to Coinbase.</div>

Data: 150.02 BTC were transferred from an anonymous address and, after passing through an intermediary, flowed into Coinbase.

The release of this new regulation marks a historic leap in the attitude of Chinese regulators towards virtual assets, shifting from a "complete ban" to a "combination of restriction and guidance."

Article Author & Source: Guofeng Law Firm On February 6, 2026, the "Notice on Further Preventing and Handling Risks Related to Virtual Currencies" (Yinfa [2026] No. 42, hereinafter referred to as "Document No. 42"), jointly issued by eight ministries led by the People's Bank of China, and the "Regulatory Guidelines on the Issuance of Asset-Backed Securities Tokens Overseas by Domestic Assets" (hereinafter referred to as the "Guidelines") simultaneously issued by the China Securities Regulatory Commission, have triggered significant reactions in the legal and financial circles...

Breaking News! The Year of China's RWA: A Compliant Channel Opens for Trillions of Yuan in Domestic Assets to Go Global

BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes wrote that the recent Bitcoin crash may stem from traders' concerns about IBIT (BlackRock) […]
The article, "Arthur Hayes Speculates on BTC Crash Cause: 'Institutional Hedging Operations': IBIT Options Explode $900 Million," was originally published on BlockTempo, the most influential blockchain ABMedia media.

Arthur Hayes speculates that the reason for the BTC crash is "institutional hedging operations": IBIT options saw a surge of $900 million.

Unusual trading in BlackRock’s bitcoin ETF, iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), has led traders to speculate that this week’s sharp Bitcoin drop may have been triggered by one or more Hong Kong–based hedge ...