Bothers me to no end that the only time crypto VCs bring up Chainlink is when they want to talk shit on it I get it, they’re underexposed bc there was no chance to buy in cheaper than retail did and they decided to fund companies whose bull case Chainlink largely nullifies But there’s simply zero respect for what Chainlink has accomplished (or even as much of an acknowledgement for how value and utility Chainlink has created for their various chain investments) Upside is that there is no VC overhangs on $LINK like with so many tokens these days; there is deep value in such independence

Bothers me to no end that the only time crypto VCs bring up Ethereum is when they want to talk shit on it I get it, they’re underexposed bc there was no chance to buy in cheaper than retail did and they decided to fund companies whose bull case Ethereum largely nullifies But there’s simply zero respect for what Ethereum has accomplished (or even as much of an acknowledgement for how value and utility Ethereum has created for their various chain investments) Upside is that there is no VC overhangs on $ETH like with so many tokens these days; there is deep value in such independence

i’m sorry, but i had to (and i know how you feel)

This is a commonality we can share However, to show how egregious what I’m pointing out is, imagine if VC investors of Eth-based DeFi apps and Eth-based L2s only ever bring up Ethereum to shit on it… That’s basically what happens with VCs who talk shit on Chainlink, but benefit from Chainlink making their VC chain investments more valuable bc of DeFi apps Chainlink brings over