๐—ฅ๐—ข๐—ฆ ๐Ÿฎ (๐—ฅ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฆ๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ ๐Ÿฎ) ๐—ข๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜„ ROS 2 is middleware for building robot software. It handles message-passing between processes, node discovery, and data serialization - the infrastructure layer so you don't write TCP sockets yourself. Key difference from ROS 1? ROS 1 used a custom TCP protocol. ROS 2 uses DDS (Data Distribution Service) - a standard that supports QoS policies, security, and deterministic communication timing. A factory arm needs guaranteed 1ms response times. ROS 1 couldn't promise that. ROS 2 can. How does it differ from alternatives? vs writing custom: you get pub/sub, service calls, parameter servers, lifecycle management out of box. Building this takes teams 6-12 months. vs proprietary frameworks (ABB RobotStudio, KUKA KRL): ROS 2 is hardware-agnostic. The same code runs on different robot brands. And you may know these big guys that already use ROS 2: โžค Bosch: warehouse robots (2,000+ units deployed); โžค NASA: VIPER lunar rover; โžค Tier IV: Autoware autonomous driving stack (production vehicles in Japan); โžค Amazon: some Proteus warehouse robots; โžค BMW, Toyota: R&D and production line automation. Adoption increased 3x from ROS 1 to ROS 2 in industrial settings (2019-2024), per Open Robotics' survey of 3,500 developers.

From Twitter
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments