Ohh well here's a novel form of regulatory capture! Use your personal ChatGPT sub to get advice on a lawsuit? Unprivileged, other side can subpoena. Your lawyer uses their sub to ask the exact same questions, and forwards you the answers? Privileged, inadmissible in court!

Moish Peltz
@mpeltz
Your AI conversations aren't privileged. Yesterday, Judge Jed Rakoff ruled that 31 documents a defendant generated using an AI tool and later shared with his defense attorneys are not protected by attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine. The logic is simple: an AI
From Twitter
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments