Three mainstream viewpoints on AI in the industry recently My husband is on vacation these past few days, so I can only check the community news after the kids go to sleep at night. There are so few worthwhile articles on the community these days. Regarding AI, there are currently three main viewpoints in the field. 1. The number of agents will explode, so tools need to be developed for agents to use. This is an interesting point of view. At first glance, it seems that the number of agents is indeed exploding. The problem with this logic is that agents themselves can also produce tools. While it cannot be ruled out that a lot of human assistance will be needed in the early stages, the agent will eventually be able to be self-sufficient. 2. After the explosive growth in the number of agents, traditional payments are no longer viable, and crypto payments are needed. The argument that traditional payments require KYC (Know Your Customer) processing, bank account opening, or AML (Agent License) procedures is problematic is largely wishful thinking. If this logic held true, people would already be using crypto payments. We still need to look at the data, observing the adoption rate and transaction volume of crypto payments among agents. 3. AI is incredibly powerful; the crypto is doomed. The doomsday theory of the crypto is actually a recurring phenomenon; every bear market sees a flurry of reports declaring that the crypto is doomed. The doomsday theory of the crypto is like a menstrual cycle that happens every four years. It will come whether or not AI is present. But I think the crypto and AI are not directly interdisciplinary fields. The main point of intersection is that the crypto uses AI-themed tokens to issue crypto. The power of AI does not replace the power of the crypto.