Danny Ryan makes a point that a lot of people miss: institutions don’t obsess over “decentralization” the way crypto bros do. They care about counterparty risk. Decentralization minimizes counterparty risk. It’s a risk management framework, not an ideology. That’s a big reason Ethereum continues to hold a structural edge over other smart contract platforms, especially in the realm of finance. But it’s not just decentralization. You also have to factor in: -Lindy effect: Ethereum has survived cycles, attacks, upgrades, and stress. -Network effects: the deepest liquidity, the most developers, the most tooling. -A culture of reliability and credible neutrality. -Increasing regulatory clarity relative to most alternatives. Put it all together, and Ethereum is the default settlement layer for "real world" onchain finance by a wide margin. That’s also why ETH is increasingly viewed as an alternative digital store of value to BTC, but with a crucial difference: it’s embedded in a productive economy. It secures the network and generates yield through staking. That’s why Ethereum is the internet of finance.

W3G ®
@w3g_io
Wall Street wants decentralization more than crypto does.
Danny Ryan and Tomasz Stańczak at Casa W3G, Buenos Aires.
From Twitter
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments
Share
Relevant content




