1. The current product experience of Damus is still very bad. The functions are primitive, stuck, it is troublesome to modify personal information, and the account re-identification is poor. Other products based on Nostr are also bad, or even worse.

2. But there is a reason for this rottenness. The design philosophy of Nostr is "simple" and "pure". Each public key represents an identity, and the content is signed and forwarded through repeaters without permission. According to BTCStudy Ajian's description - [Nostr is a public-key-based, minimalist, censorship-resistant information transmission protocol].

3. The product experience of BTC is also very bad. It only relies on [providing people with an additional choice] to provide an additional, independent and free choice when legal currency, the central bank and the government are not trusted. That's what makes Nostr so exciting.

4. There are many problems in traditional social media, some of which are product-level problems, such as the proliferation of fake accounts; but some are non-product problems, such as media manipulation, excessive censorship, and social awareness tearing. Nostr or Damus can only solve some problems, but that's enough.

5. For users, there is of course no need to give up traditional social products such as Twitter and WeChat right now, just like we still need to use legal currency with BTC, but this does not mean that BTC or Nostr is meaningless.

npub1f3s28argq8cpr9vyegsu39fk4545pw8sec446ht3875pt49tyzysuheu9e A wave of cross-correlation