For Arbitrum Orbit chains, your data availability (DA) choice is the single biggest lever on fees, throughput, and “trust model.” Get DA right and you unlock cheaper transactions, faster finality, and...

<p></p><img src="https://static.fwimg.io/img/feed/68a2d96ec08f732cc0570654.png" data-content-value="followin-img"/><div></div><p>For <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/appchains/arbitrum-orbit-rollups/" rel="nofollow">Arbitrum Orbit chains</a>, your data availability (DA) choice is the single biggest lever on fees, throughput, and “trust model.” Get DA right and you unlock cheaper transactions, faster finality, and cleaner operations. Get it wrong and you’ll either overpay on <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/l1-blockchain-to-rollup-infrastructure/" rel="nofollow">L1</a> or accept risk you didn’t plan for.</p><p>Arbitrum Orbit provides three options for this. Default <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/blockchain-protocols/deploy-ethereum-blockchain/" rel="nofollow">Ethereum</a> DA, AltDA for off-chain data, and Arbitrum AnyTrust mode.</p><p>Zeeve <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/rollups/" rel="nofollow">Rollups-as-a-Service</a> (RaaS) supports all three and has a production client for all of them.</p><h1>Quick Recap: Arbitrum Orbit Rollups &amp; Data Availability Layer</h1><p>Arbitrum Orbit lets you launch customizable L2s/L3s using Arbitrum’s Nitro stack, inheriting Ethereum-grade security when you want it, and swapping components (fee token, permissions, DA, etc.) when you need flexibility.</p><p>The <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/rollups/" rel="nofollow">Rollup</a> mode posts transaction data on <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/blockchain-protocols/deploy-ethereum-blockchain/" rel="nofollow">Ethereum</a> (now often as blobs via EIP-4844), which anyone can download and verify. AnyTrust mode posts DA Certificates to L1 while a permissioned DAC stores data off-chain. This results in dramatic cost savings through a mild trust assumption, with a safety fallback in place if the DAC misbehaves.</p><p>For L3s settling to Arbitrum One, the ArbOS 20 “Atlas” upgrade made blob posting cheaper in Rollup mode. But if your L3 already uses an alternative DA (AnyTrust, Celestia, EigenDA, NEAR DA, Avail), those fees don’t change from Dencun because you aren’t using Ethereum for DA.</p><p>Read More:</p><ol><li><div><a href="https://www.zeeve.io/blog/how-arbitrum-orbit-simplifies-building-app-specific-rollup-solutions/?" rel="nofollow">How Arbitrum Orbit Simplifies Building App-Specific Rollups</a>?</div></li><li><div><a href="https://www.zeeve.io/blog/the-ultimate-arbitrum-orbit-advantage-for-all-things-layer3/" rel="nofollow">The Ultimate Arbitrum Orbit Advantage for All Things Layer3</a></div></li><li><div><a href="https://www.zeeve.io/blog/what-is-data-availability-layer-in-rollups/" rel="nofollow">Data Availability Layer in Rollups: what is it and why do we need one?</a></div></li></ol><h1>What DA Options Does the Orbit Stack Offer?</h1><h1>A) Default Ethereum DA (Rollup Mode)</h1><p>When you choose this option, all batch data is posted on Ethereum (calldata or EIP-4844 blobs). Security “follows” Ethereum: anyone can reconstruct a state, run a node, and verify fraud proofs trustlessly. The trade-off is paying Ethereum’s data market (even with blobs, it’s not free).</p><p><strong>When to pick it:</strong></p><ul><li><div>Reg-heavy DeFi/bridges that require minimal additional trust assumptions.</div></li><li><div>High-TVL apps where Ethereum-inherited security outweighs higher DA costs.</div></li><li><div>L3s that want lower fees post-Dencun and are OK with L1 fee exposure</div></li></ul><p>Orbit Rollup chains that post blobs to L1 see meaningful fee reductions after the Ethereum Dencun upgrade(EIP 4844). Atlas enables blob posting and other fee tweaks. Though L3s on alternative DA see <em>no</em> Dencun fee change because they don’t post data to <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/blockchain-protocols/deploy-ethereum-blockchain/" rel="nofollow">Ethereum</a>.</p><p>So, Ethereum DA is the “safest default,” especially for value-dense apps, but you pay for that security in L1 fees.</p><h1>B) Alt DA: Celestia, EigenDA, NEAR DA, Avail</h1><p>These are all off-chain <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/blog/what-is-data-availability-layer-in-rollups" rel="nofollow">Data Availability</a> options. Instead of posting raw data to Ethereum, your Orbit chain posts to a <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/blog/how-modular-blockchains-are-secretly-fueling-web3s-rapid-spread" rel="nofollow">modular</a> DA network designed for cheap, scalable DA. Each network offers different guarantees and integration maturity:</p><ul><li><div><strong>Celestia</strong>: Modular DA with data availability sampling so light clients don’t need to download full blocks; Orbit integration uses a DA provider + preimage oracle + Blobstream for on-chain commitments, and includes a native fallback path in Nitro if DA fails. This combo delivers big fee cuts for L3s without giving up verifiability guarantees at the light-client level.</div></li><li><div><strong>EigenDA</strong>: Ethereum-aligned DA secured by EigenLayer operators, and teams can bridge from Arbitrum One/Nova/Ethereum while keeping DA costs off L1. It’s a pragmatic middle path when you want lower fees but prefer an Ethereum-centric operator set and mature RaaS support.</div></li><li><div><strong>NEAR DA</strong>: provides a low-cost DA blob store with a light client; public benchmarks show large cost deltas vs. Ethereum calldata and other DA alternatives under specific circumstances.</div></li><li><div><strong>Avail</strong>: Validity-proof-backed DA with erasure coding and robust sampling; official docs walk through deploying an Arbitrum Orbit L3 on Avail DA (including parent L2 choices). Good fit when you want DA chain neutrality, light-client assurances, and a documented Orbit path from day one.</div></li></ul><p>The ArbOS 20 post explicitly lists these alt DAs in the Orbit context (AnyTrust, Avail, Celestia, EigenDA, NEAR DA).</p><p>Read More: <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/blog/alt-da-solutions-changing-the-cost-game-for-l2-rollups-spotlight-on-key-players/" rel="nofollow">Alt DA Solutions Changing the Cost Game for L2 Rollups: Spotlight on Key Players</a></p><p><strong>When to pick alt DA</strong>:</p><ul><li><div>High-throughput, cost-sensitive apps (social, gaming, agent networks) that need predictable low fees.</div></li><li><div>Enterprises balancing security with cost/perf by anchoring to L2/L3 plus a DA network, not L1.</div></li><li><div>Multi-chain ecosystems wanting DA portability beyond Ethereum.</div></li></ul><p>The Trade-off is that you accept additional components and different trust/<a href="https://www.zeeve.io/blog/a-guide-to-blockchain-security-and-compliance" rel="nofollow">security models</a> (validity sampling, light clients). You also need operational maturity (monitoring, alerting, data retention SLOs).</p><h1>C) AnyTrust DA Mode (Local DA with DAC) for Speed, Cost &amp; Privacy</h1><p>In AnyTrust, your chain posts only a Data Availability Certificate (DACert) to L1. A small, permissioned Data Availability Committee (DAC) actually stores the data using the Data Availability Server (DAS) software. This slashes fees and can improve privacy while keeping a safety fallback: if the DAC fails assumptions, the chain can halt and revert to Rollup-like behavior to preserve safety.</p><p><strong>Why teams choose it</strong>:</p><ul><li><div>Order-of-magnitude fee reduction vs. full L1 posting.</div></li><li><div>Fast finality UX for consumer apps and AI/micro-tx use cases.</div></li><li><div>Configurable privacy by controlling data retention and access paths</div></li></ul><p>But someone must run and monitor the DAS infrastructure (storage backends, RPCs, BLS keys, thresholds). Good providers help set up the DAC, configure signers/thresholds, and integrate CDNs or mirrors for global fetch performance.</p><p>If your goal is mass-scale, low-fee transactions with a mild trust assumption and robust fallback, AnyTrust is often the best “performance budget” for Orbit.</p><h1>Zeeve RaaS for Your Aribitrum Orbit Rollup Data Availability</h1><p>Zeeve’s RaaS gives builders a menu of DA options — <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/blockchain-protocols/deploy-ethereum-blockchain/" rel="nofollow">Ethereum</a> (Rollup), AnyTrust, or alt DAs (Celestia, EigenDA, NEAR DA, Avail) — with production deployment, monitoring, and life-cycle ops as part of the package.</p><p>Press enter or click to view image in full size</p><img src="https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:875/0*Qb9vECRFHPxmDyuo" data-content-value="followin-img"/><p>Two examples you can point prospects to:</p><ul><li><div><strong>Skynet (AI-optimized L3 on Orbit)</strong> — Built with Zeeve, <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/blog/skynet-new-blockchain-on-arbitrum-orbit-will-scale-ai-agents-at-warp-speed" rel="nofollow">Skynet</a> customized fee mechanics (SKYUSD gas) and chose AnyTrust for “cheap and predictable” native DA — exactly what high-frequency AI agent markets need. Offchain Labs’ Orbit team publicly highlighted the AnyTrust angle.</div></li></ul><p>Read More: <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/blog/skynet-new-blockchain-on-arbitrum-orbit-will-scale-ai-agents-at-warp-speed/" rel="nofollow">Skynet’s New Blockchain on Arbitrum Orbit will Scale AI Agents at Warp Speed</a></p><ul><li><div><strong>PropFTX / Propulence (RWA / Real Estate)</strong> — Propulence is a Zeeve-powered Orbit chain focused on tokenized real estate with a QUIDS property-backed stablecoin and PROPX for governance/utility, emphasizing regulatory alignment for institutions. (Their public site frames compliance and cross-border flows; Zeeve references PropFTX among Orbit launches.)</div></li></ul><p>There could be many more such examples, like the Aether Orbit chain, the Parfin Orbit mainnet, and many more.</p><p><strong>How does this matter to a buyer</strong>?</p><ul><li><div>Choice without integration pain. Orbit supports multiple DA paths; Zeeve has pre-built integrations so you can switch or mix (e.g., start AnyTrust, evaluate Avail/Celestia/EigenDA for specific sub-systems) with minimal rework.</div></li><li><div>Operational excellence. Running DA is real ops: DAS nodes, blob posting, retention SLOs, signer thresholds, key rotations. Zeeve’s managed stack handles configuration + monitoring for Rollup blobs post-Dencun and DAS/DAC health in AnyTrust.</div></li><li><div>Proof via real networks. From AI L3s to RWA chains and a multitude of other use cases, Zeeve is shipping Orbit chains in production..</div></li></ul><h1>So, Which DA Should You Choose?</h1><p>Choose Ethereum DA (Rollup) if you’re security-first (DeFi/bridges) and comfortable paying L1 data fees — even post-Dencun. You get the strongest “anyone can verify from L1” story.Choose an Alt DA (Celestia/EigenDA/NEAR/Avail) if cost and scale are critical and you want modularity beyond Ethereum. This is a great fit for media-heavy, social, <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/web3-infrastructure-for-gaming/" rel="nofollow">gaming</a>, and data-rich use cases that don’t need full L1 DA. Choose AnyTrust if you want ultra-low fees + fast UX with a safety fallback, and you’re willing to adopt a permissioned DAC that you (and partners) operate. This is ideal for <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/web3-infrastructure-for-crypto-x-ai-rollup/" rel="nofollow">AI</a> agents, high-volume consumer apps, and many enterprise flows.</p><p>If you want the optionality to change your mind later — or run mixed strategies — work with a provider that already supports all three models in production. That’s where Zeeve RaaS wins.</p><p>Here’s a guided video that shows how you can deploy an Arbitrum Orbit rollup DevNet in minutes. The process for testnet is also the same. The list of integration, configurations, data availability options, everything is shown in the video:</p><p>Press enter or click to view image in full size</p><img src="https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:875/0*IixUsWpV2Nf4TWfl" data-content-value="followin-img"/><h1>FAQs:</h1><p><strong>Does EIP-4844 (Dencun) make AnyTrust or Alt DAs obsolete?</strong></p><p>No. Dencun reduces Ethereum DA costs via blobs, helping Rollup-mode chains. If your L3 uses alternative DA (AnyTrust/Celestia/EigenDA/NEAR/Avail), fees don’t change from Dencun since you’re not posting data to <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/blockchain-protocols/deploy-ethereum-blockchain/" rel="nofollow">Ethereum</a>. These options still shine for throughput and predictable low costs.</p><p><strong>Is AnyTrust “centralized”?</strong></p><p>AnyTrust uses a permissioned DAC. The model assumes a small threshold of honest DAC members. That’s a mild trust assumption compared to pure <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/rollups/" rel="nofollow">Rollup </a>mode, but it brings big fees and UX wins and includes a fallback if assumptions break. You can diversify DAC membership to mitigate risk.</p><p><strong>Can I move from Ethereum DA to an Alt DA (or vice-versa) later?</strong>Yes, Orbit is built for modularity. Practically, you’ll plan a network upgrade, reconfigure posting (blobs vs. DA endpoints), and manage bridges/clients through the transition. Providers with pre-built DA integrations (Zeeve) reduce this migration friction.</p><p><strong>What’s the difference between AnyTrust and Avail/Celestia/EigenDA/NEAR DA?</strong>AnyTrust = DAC signs a promise (DACert) and stores data; you post only the certificate to L1. Alt DAs = separate DA chains with their own consensus/validity sampling/light clients. Both reduce L1 data costs; trust and ops profiles differ.</p><p><strong>Which DA is best for high-volume consumer apps?</strong></p><p>AnyTrust or a well-integrated alt DA is usually best for predictable, low fees and fast UX.</p>

Followin

Best Data Availability Options in Arbitrum Orbit Rollup Providers (and Why Zeeve RaaS Stands Out)

아비트럼(Arbitrum) 오르빗 체인의 경우, 데이터 가용성(DA) 선택이 수수료, 처리량, 그리고 "신뢰 모델"에 가장 큰 영향을 미칩니다. 데이터 가용성을 제대로 선택하면 더 저렴한 거래, 더 빠른 완결성을 얻을 수 있으며...

<p></p><img src="https://static.fwimg.io/img/feed/68a2d96ec08f732cc0570654.png" data-content-value="followin-img"/><div></div><p><a href="https://www.zeeve.io/appchains/arbitrum-orbit-rollups/" rel="nofollow">아비트럼 오르빗 체인</a>의 경우, 데이터 가용성(DA) 선택이 수수료, 처리량, "신뢰 모델"에 가장 큰 영향을 미칩니다. DA를 제대로 선택하면 더 저렴한 거래, 더 빠른 완결성, 더 깨끗한 운영이 가능해집니다. 잘못 선택하면 <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/l1-blockchain-to-rollup-infrastructure/" rel="nofollow">L1</a>에 과도하게 지불하거나 계획하지 않은 위험을 감수하게 됩니다.</p>

(전체 번역 계속...)</p><p>이미지를 전체 크기로 보려면 Enter 키를 누르거나 클릭하세요</p><img src="https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:875/0*IixUsWpV2Nf4TWfl" data-content-value="followin-img"/><h1>자주 묻는 질문:</h1><p><strong>EIP-4844(덴컨)가 AnyTrust 또는 대체 데이터 가용성(DA)을 쓸모없게 만드나요?</strong></p><p>아니요. 덴컨은 블롭을 통해 이더리움 데이터 가용성 비용을 줄여 롤업 모드 체인을 돕습니다. L3가 대체 데이터 가용성(AnyTrust/Celestia/EigenDA/NEAR/Avail)을 사용하는 경우, 데이터를 <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/blockchain-protocols/deploy-ethereum-blockchain/" rel="nofollow">이더리움</a>에 게시하지 않기 때문에 덴컨으로 인해 수수료가 변경되지 않습니다. 이러한 옵션은 여전히 처리량과 예측 가능한 낮은 비용에서 뛰어납니다.</p><p><strong>AnyTrust는 "중앙화"된 것인가요?</strong></p><p>AnyTrust는 허가된 데이터 가용성 위원회(DAC)를 사용합니다. 이 모델은 소수의 정직한 DAC 구성원을 가정합니다. 이는 순수 <a href="https://www.zeeve.io/rollups/" rel="nofollow">롤업</a> 모드에 비해 약한 신뢰 가정이지만, 큰 수수료와 사용자 경험 개선을 가져오며 가정이 깨질 경우 대비책을 포함합니다. DAC 구성원을 다양화하여 위험을 완화할 수 있습니다.</p><p><strong>나중에 이더리움 데이터 가용성에서 대체 데이터 가용성(또는 그 반대)로 이동할 수 있나요?</strong>네, 오르빗은 모듈성을 위해 설계되었습니다. 실제로 네트워크 업그레이드를 계획하고, 게시 구성(블롭 대 데이터 가용성 엔드포인트)을 재구성하며, 전환 중에 브리지/클라이언트를 관리하게 됩니다. 사전 구축된 데이터 가용성 통합(Zeeve)을 제공하는 공급자는 이러한 마이그레이션 마찰을 줄입니다.</p><p><strong>AnyTrust와 Avail/Celestia/EigenDA/NEAR 데이터 가용성의 차이점은 무엇인가요?</strong>AnyTrust = DAC가 약속(DACert)에 서명하고 데이터를 저장하며, L1에 인증서만 게시합니다. 대체 데이터 가용성 = 자체 합의/유효성 샘플링/경량 클라이언트가 있는 별도의 데이터 가용성 체인입니다. 둘 다 L1 데이터 비용을 줄이지만, 신뢰와 운영 프로필은 다릅니다.</p><p><strong>대규모 소비자 앱에 가장 적합한 데이터 가용성은 무엇인가요?</strong></p><p>일반적으로 AnyTrust 또는 잘 통합된 대체 데이터 가용성이 예측 가능한 낮은 수수료와 빠른 사용자 경험에 가장 적합합니다.</p>

아비트럼(Arbitrum) Orbit Rollup 제공업체의 최고의 데이터 가용성 옵션(그리고 Zeeve RaaS가 돋보이는 이유)

이더리움은 목요일 3,830달러로 하락하며, 비트코인이 10만 8천 달러 근처로 폭락하는 가운데 24시간 만에 거의 9% 하락했습니다.
암호화폐 분석가 IncomeSharks는 OBV 지표 붕괴 속에서 이더리움 가격 약세를 지적했습니다.

이더리움 가격, 주요 지표 모멘텀 붕괴 신호로 3,830달러로 하락

암호화폐 시장은 초반에 침체기를 겪었지만 목요일 오후에는 미국 시장에서 상황이 악화되었습니다. 비트코인(BTC) 109,503.90달러가 109,000달러 아래로 떨어지면서 거의 한 달 만에 가장 낮은 가격을 기록했습니다.
이더리움(ETH)$3,891.68 자두...

비트코인, 이더리움, 솔라나(Solana) 나 매도 심화로 암호화폐 청산액 10억 달러 돌파

주요 내용:
-
현물 비트코인 ​​ETF 흐름의 둔화는 기관 수요가 약해지고 있음을 나타내며 강세 심리가 냉각되고 있음을 암시합니다.
-
108,000달러는 하락세에 있는 사람들의 단기 목표이며, 일부 비트코인(BTC) 분석가들은...