Hak Research

Hak Research

45,933 Twitter followers

Follow

Leading Crypto Insights Vietnam - Airdrop/Retroactive: @GemResearch_

Posts

WARNING: BUIDLPAD IS CALCULATING WRONG PRICES FOR USERS! Farming on Concrete & Bybit also has a hopper, guys! The @buidlpad platform is miscalculating profits for users and myself, even though I've contributed to the team on Discord, but the MOD team doesn't seem to understand what's going on. Specifically: 1⃣ A deposit of 12,000 $USDT made on 31/03/2026 2⃣ As of April 3rd, 2027, a total of $5.9 in profit has been received based on 3 days. -> Receive $1.96 in profit every day. 3⃣ However, if calculated based on an APY of approximately 12% (converted to an APR of 11.39%), the MINIMUM DAILY PROFIT IS $3.74. This means that after 3 days, the minimum profit must be $11.22. - Buildlpad's profit payout: $5.9. - Minimum actual profit to be received: $11.22 Note: 12% is lower than the original figure of 16% and also lower than the current figure on Buildlpad of 12.42%. Is it a display error? Actually, this isn't a display error from Buildlpad because when I tried withdrawing money from the platform, the expected amount I received was exactly the amount displayed. Lately, I've encountered several yield farming platforms that display one APY (Average Earnings per User) value, but the actual return from farming is significantly lower. The most recent example is @ConcreteXYZ, where the displayed APY is somewhere between 7-8%, but the actual return is only around 3-4%. So, if you're holding $USDC $USDT and want to optimize, remember to calculate and observe carefully to avoid being ripped off by the platform for a long time. Another case involves @Bybit_Official, which charges a withdrawal fee of up to 0.1% for $USDT on their Mantle Vaults. Although I had previously contacted the Bybit team and received a response that the fee was very low and negligible, I was still charged the highest fee of 0.1% when I attempted to withdraw my funds. Farming has many risks, including hacking, but there are also countless other problems that can arise. twitter.com/HakResearch/status...

CANTON NETWORK VAR IS CRUEL TO ZKSYNC! Write this down to read later and broaden your horizons, guys! If you are investing in or observing the Real World Assets sector, you should read the articles below about leading projects in this field to gain more perspective and find suitable investment opportunities. In the conflict between @CantonNetwork and @zksync, you'll see the following: 1⃣ Canton Network's perspective is that of people from TradFi building a product to serve TradFi itself. 2⃣ The perspective of zkSync is that of people from DeFi building the infrastructure to bring TradFi onto the Blockchain. 3⃣ From the opposing viewpoints of both sides, we can see the following: - Strengths/weaknesses of Canton - Strengths/weaknesses of zkSync I believe that there will be many insights and practical perspectives for everyone from such civilized discussions. P.S.: Please note that you should not use charts or prices ($CC or $ZK) to evaluate projects or make personal attacks!

Thank you @gluk64. A rebuttal that attacks the arguments, not the person, lets us have a mature conversation that will improve both Canton and zkSync. I hope others follow your lead. If you ever want to meet for a beer, I’m buying 🍻 x.com/gluk64/status/…

EDGEX & THE LATEST SCAM Airdrop ! Can we finally end this trend, guys? 🥲 The other day I saw $EDGE listing the Pre-Market on Binance with a FDV of $700-800 million, and I thought the EdgeX Airdrop team was making a killing because at the same time, $BP only had a TGE of around $300 million or $DIME only around a hundred million. But it turned out the developers were artificially inflating the FDV to make their own money. However, everything became clear yesterday. According to several reputable onchain analytics platforms: The top 26 wallets received a total of 140 million, accounting for 14% of the total supply and more than half of the Airdrop (the project used 25% of the total supply to Airdrop to the community). Shortly after, @edgeX_exchange clarified that this allocation was for LP and to support the early development of the platform, who agreed to lock up Token for one year. From my perspective, EdgeX should have a separate allocation within Tokenomics for these people, rather than taking it from the Airdrop . This led to massive losses for many Airdrop farmers over the past period, with over 8,400 wallets receiving less than 100 Airdrops, equivalent to just a few dollars. CASE STUDY: According to some sources, one user with over 6,000 points lost approximately 100,000 tokens while only receiving over 5,900 Token , equivalent to a Pre-Market value of around 4,000. - Point OTC price = $25 - $35 Official Point price = $0.67 -> The Mega Airdrop has become a disaster as the actual Point price has dropped by 97%. In short, from my personal perspective... 1⃣ The EdgeX development team is farming Edge Points themselves and selling them over-the-counter (OTC) at exorbitant prices to the community. Chia condolences to those who thought it would be like Lighter Point and bought in – they're probably stuck at the peak and won't know where to start. 2⃣ Self-list at a high valuation to sell or hedge Token , rather than listing at a high FDV to create a win for the community. 3⃣ +1 Airdrop deals are a thing of the past after @paradex's $DIME (many people even tried to buy at the Dip $DIME...) Following the resounding success of $HYPE or $LIT, the Perp DEX Airdrop is gradually fading into obscurity. This is understandable when we look back and see: - Layer 2: $OP $ARB bold breasts $ZK $STRK controversial and later all tight-fitting. - reStaking: $ETHFI is a big gamble, $EIGEN causes controversy and then $RENZO $ZIRCUIT $PUFFER also goes down the drain. - Perp DEX: $HYPE $LIT exploded then $DIME $EDGE While Layer 2 only costs a small amount, and reStaking takes time and involves buying at the peak (though you'll eventually break even), the Perp DEX Airdrop story costs significantly more money, time, and effort. EXPERIENCE: If you can't get ahead of the market to catch the trend, then once the trend has broken out, it's best to stay put. Standing still might not make you money, but it certainly won't make you lose money. In this market, as long as you have money, you can always make it back, but if you lose money, it's very difficult! twitter.com/HakResearch/status...

ETHEREUM IS PREPARING TO RESCUE Layer 2 ! Go solve the problems you created yourself! 🤣 If Layer 2s rescued the market in general and @ethereum in particular from 2023 onwards, then Ethereum will now have to rescue Layer 2s if it doesn't want this model to become obsolete. The problems with Layer 2s have existed since day one, not just recently, and include: 1⃣ The user experience is extremely poor, as moving between different Layer 2s requires using multiple cross-chain solutions and incurs transaction fees. 2⃣ Liquidation Shard occurs when each Layer 2 is independent of the others in terms of liquidation, leading to -> Layer 2 entities are draining Ethereum's liquidation through incentives. -> Layer 2 entities drain each other's liquidation . 3⃣ Developers have to repeatedly perform their work on each Layer 2 , leading to wasted resources, time, and effort. From a community sharing a common destiny, this community now has to suck each other's blood to survive. That's why @ethereumfndn partnered with Gnosis to launch the Ethereum Economic Zone (EZZ) concept. When launched, EZZ will address the issues mentioned above, including: 1⃣ Benefits for users - Completely eliminating the Bridge means users can fully interact on Ethereum and many other Layer 2 platforms within a single transaction. - The entire transaction process will either succeed or fail, thereby eliminating the risk of errors occurring midway through the process when the user has to do it manually. - Experience as if on a single Chain. For example, you can buy $ARB with $USDC on Base in a single transaction. 2⃣ Benefits for liquidation Liquidation no longer belongs to any particular Layer 2 entity, but will become collective liquidation , returning to its core element: a COMMUNITY OF SHARED DESTINY. -> Increased liquidation The user experience will also be much better. 3⃣ Benefits for developers Instead of deploying multiple smart contracts for different Layer 2 , with EEZ, developers only need to deploy a smart contract once to reach users on the mainnet and all rollups participating in EEZ. -> Reduce the number of duplicate tasks. -> Reduce risk for each DApp on different Chains. 4⃣ Benefits for the Ethereum Ecosystem - Addressing the long- Shard and liquidation issue of liquidity fragmentation. - Reduce security risks. - Increase competitiveness with other Layer 1 frameworks like Solana. After reading about EZZ, I felt it was an upgrade to Account Abstraction , but on a much larger and broader scale. AA technology has become quite deeply integrated into Ethereum and its ecosystem, as many transactions are now grouped into a single transaction. Hopefully, EZZ will be able to do the same in the near future, though that's certainly not going to happen anytime soon! twitter.com/HakResearch/status...

MIDAS IS HIGHLY LIKELY TO GET A BUILDLPAD, GUYS! Pool Buildpad is on today, guys! Remember to play! Midas has officially successfully raised $50 million in its Series A funding round with participation from funds such as Coinbase Ventures, RRE Ventures, Creandum, GSR, Framework Ventures, Franklin Templeton Investments, and others. This brings the total number of successful Capital rounds for @MidasRWA to $63 million. Therefore, the probability of Midas launching a Pre-Sale on Buildpad is increasing. So, if you have idle assets, you might consider it. 1⃣ Participate in providing liquidation for $USDC - $USDT0 on Buildlpad. This pool is managed by Midas. 2⃣ Participate by depositing money into Vaults on Buildlpad to earn APY and have a chance to receive Airdrop & Pre-Sale slots in the future. At this point, the opportunities are much clearer and will go to those who are quick to seize them! twitter.com/HakResearch/status...

ASTER SUPER UPDATE ON TOKENOMICS REGARDING INFLATION One of the biggest problems for @Aster_DEX and $ASTER is inflation. The excessive inflation of $ASTER causes: - Users are hesitant to use Aster products because one of their benefits relates to the Airdrop. Although the price has been quite good recently, this does not guarantee the future of the product given the high inflation rate. - Builders, when looking at Aster, also hesitate to build DApps and Protocols on Aster Layer 1. Therefore, the Aster team decided to change the issuance structure by switching from monthly unlocking for the ecosystem with 1% of the total supply each month to a model that only Token Issuance to participants in the Stake. -> The deflation rate of $ASTER decreased by 97% (from 78.4M $ASTER to 1.8 - 2.5M $ASTER). Furthermore, all $ASTER released to the Ecosystem & Community from the time of TGE will remain unchanged. I myself am still closely following and maintaining my position $ASTER for several reasons: 1⃣ Backed by @cz_binance & Binance from the very beginning. 2⃣ The development team does not Token Sale. This is easily seen by looking at the chart of $ASTER, as the Token price has remained stable for a long period, even though $BTC is highly volatile. 3⃣ The growth period of $ASTER is still relatively long, as: - @HyperliquidX is still leading the Perp DEX wave, and Perp DEX remains one of the hottest stories in the market. - The gap between $ASTER and $HYPE is still too large, meaning $ASTER needs 7x to equal $HYPE at the same time. 4⃣ Good tokenomics has the following points: - There is a long-term Staking program that helps reduce the supply on the market. - There is a Buy Back program based on revenue. - $ASTER will be the main transaction fee for Aster Layer 1. One of the things I've noticed with the projects I've been following recently is that the DEVELOPMENT TEAM Token Sale IS HELD Token . And even if the team doesn't sell, they still have very high expectations for the project's future. The projects currently on my watchlist include $CC $MON $ZRO $ZEC $OKB $ASTER $AZTEC Note: This article reflects personal opinions, experiences, and perspectives, and should not be considered investment advice! twitter.com/HakResearch/status...

Loading..