Followin LogoFollowin
  • icon of HOMEicon of HOME
    Today
  • icon of INTELicon of INTEL
    Intel
  • icon of EXPLOREicon of EXPLORE
    Market
  • icon of EARNicon of EARN
    Earn
  • icon of SETTINGicon of SETTING
    Settings
    • Account
    • Theme Selection
      • Light
      • Dark
    • Language
      • English
      • 简体中文
      • 繁體中文
      • Tiếng Việt
      • 한국어
Followin APP
Mine Web3 Possibilities
avatar
Log in
avatar
Anna K. Gorisch
15,004 Twitter followers
Follow
Posts
avatar
Anna K. Gorisch
12-26
More to the point, the Immigration & Nationality Act requires the hearings. It is codified in statute along with avenues for relief, so what Miller advocates is a rejection of the rule of law. When they strand H-1B workers abroad under the guise of social media vetting, it is a rejection of the rule of law.
Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)
@adamscochran
12-26
Believe it or not @StephenM the constitution does not contain the text: “Only if it’s convenient to do so” It does not give a fuck about how long it takes. It says it clearly and unwaveringly that: “No *PERSON* shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due x.com/thomassowell/s…
-- END --