Apple is currently blocking Epic Games Sweden’s Fortnite notarization despite finding no rule violations, while demanding we revoke our Fortnite submission to the US App Store. We are going back to US court to argue that Apple is again violating the injunction.

Apple told Epic it should submit Fortnite for the US through their Swedish account, and Epic did just that.
Then Apple changed their mind and said they would not review it until the court ruled.
Apple keeps choosing poorly.

Kosta Eleftheriou

Twitter

尽管没有发现任何违规行为，但苹果目前仍在阻止 Epic Games Sweden 对 Fortnite 的公证，同时要求我们撤销向美国 App Store 提交的 Fortnite。我们将回到美国法院，辩称苹果再次违反了禁令。

加密风险投资基金 Hashed 近期发布了一份题为《协议经济：2026 年展望》的战略报告，其中指出加密货币行业即将进入“……阶段”。

哈希值：与实体经济挂钩的数字资产项目将在 2026 年蓬勃发展。

文章作者：林晚晚的猫(@linwanwan823)
文章来源：X
原文标题：华人首富赵长鹏年终十大问答
---------------------------------------------------------------
BNB股东年终大会刚刚结束。
听完CZ的年终AMA，晚晚我选了10条问答总结
划重点：预测市场，稳定币大战2.0还没开始
1.被特赦后什么感受？
CZ："心理上有一种v...

赵长鹏年终答卷：关于币安、监管与加密未来的十问

日本央行官方将基准利率上调至 30 年来的最高水平，标记世界第三大经济体的货币政策迎来了一个重要的转折点。

日本继续上涨利率，达到30年来的最高水平。

As a result, Fortnite is offline on iOS in the European Union indefinitely despite being distributed through the Epic Games Store there. Apple’s abuse of its interlocked web of controls shows that any notarization process must be in the hands of an independent body.

因此，尽管 Fortnite 透过 Epic Games Store 发行，但它仍无限期地在欧盟的 iOS 上下线。苹果滥用其错综复杂的控制网络表明，任何公证过程都必须由独立机构负责。

There are plenty of examples of independent bodies ensuring security, rather than monopoly control by a single corporation motivated to undermine competition. HTTPS security is an example, and has worked fantastically on the web for decades.

有许多例子表明，独立机构可以确保安全，而不是由一家旨在破坏竞争的单一公司进行垄断控制。 HTTPS 安全性就是一个例子，几十年来它在网路上发挥了出色的作用。