The White House has just had the most recent closed-door meeting related to the regulation of stablecoins. The discussion was characterized by the officials as fruitful. Nevertheless, there was no con...

<div><div>
<p>The White House has just had the most recent closed-door meeting related to the regulation of stablecoins. The discussion was characterized by the officials as fruitful. Nevertheless, there was no consensus. The administration instead gave a time limit. Pressure is now on the lawmakers to find a compromise on the CLARITY Act by March 1. Both banks and crypto firms are put on the spot by that deadline.</p>
<adv/><blockquote>
<p>🚨WRAPPED: White House Sets MARCH 1 Deadline on CLARITY Act — “Compromise Is In The Air,” But No Deal Yet 👀🇺🇸<br/><br/>Today’s closed-door stablecoin talks at the White House just ended — both sides called it “productive.”<br/><br/>Banks walked in with a written list of “prohibition… https://t.co/9oz85PPJxE pic.twitter.com/OuUxz6iolR</p>
— Diana (@InvestWithD) February 11, 2026</blockquote>
<adv/><h2><strong><strong>What the CLARITY Act Is Trying to Solve</strong></strong></h2>
<p>The CLARITY Act is intended to add some order to the regulation of digital assets in the U.S. It would have the majority of cryptocurrencies under CFTC regulation. Simultaneously, it would provide a clear understanding of the occasion when the SEC is at liberty. The structure might put an end to decades of regulatory uncertainty. Hence, the bill is viewed by a number of people in crypto as a stepping stone to wider institutional acceptance.</p>
<p>Banks however came in with stiff objections. They presented a written document that had harsh prohibition principles. These tenets focus on the interest and stablecoin yield programs. According to banks, stablecoins with yields pose a threat to the traditional deposit. Consequently, they would like prohibitions on financial motivation of those holding stablecoins. They also suggest minimal exemption, severe punishment, and formal research on the risks of flights of deposits.</p>
<h2><strong>Crypto Firms Push for Flexibility</strong></h2>
<p>Crypto representatives retaliated on the other side. According to them, yield is not a speculation. Rather, it portrays on-chain efficiency. In addition, they caution that the prohibition of rewards would kill innovation. The Chief Legal Officer of Ripple states that a certain compromise is forming. Transaction-related rewards can be exempted. That change would be able to maintain functionality without necessarily competing with bank deposits.</p>
<p>The deadline of the White House changes the nature of negotiations. Concessions are brought by time pressure. The expanded crypto market reforms may once more stall without a deal. Such an outcome would postpone comprehensiveness to exchanges, issuers, and developers. On the contrary, a trade-off would open much desired regulatory assurance. There is a close observation in the markets.</p>
<h2><strong>What This Means for Crypto Markets</strong></h2>
<p>This controversy extends beyond stablecoins. It molds the crypto policy in the U.S. When the legislators find the balance, both innovation and compliance may co-exist. In case of failure in negotiations, the process of fragmentation persists. Anyhow, the result will affect the capital flows, the development of the stablecoins, and the competitiveness of the U.S. in the digital financial sphere.</p>

</div></div>

White House Sets March 1 Deadline for CLARITY Act

白宫刚刚举行了最近一次关于稳定币监管的闭门会议。官员们称此次讨论富有成效。然而，会议并未达成任何协议……

<div><div><p>白宫刚刚举行了最近一次关于稳定币监管的闭门会议。官员们称此次讨论富有成效。然而，会议并未达成共识。政府反而设定了最后期限。现在，议员们面临着在3月1日前就《CLARITY法案》达成妥协的压力。届时，银行和加密货币公司都将面临严峻考验。</p><adv/><blockquote><p> 🚨最新消息：白宫将《CLARITY法案》的最后期限定为3月1日——“妥协的迹象已经出现”，但尚未达成协议👀🇺🇸<br/><br/>今天在白宫举行的闭门稳定币谈判刚刚结束——双方都称谈判“富有成效”。<br/><br/>班克斯拿着一份“禁令”清单走了进来…… https://t.co/9oz85PPJxE pic.twitter.com/OuUxz6iolR</p> — Diana (@InvestWithD) 2026年2月11日</blockquote><adv/><h2><strong><strong>《CLARITY法案》试图解决什么问题？</strong></strong></h2><p> 《CLARITY法案》旨在规范美国数字资产的监管，使大多数加密货币纳入美国商品期货交易委员会（CFTC）的监管范围。同时，该法案也将明确美国证券交易委员会（SEC）的监管权限。这一框架有望终结数十年来监管的不确定性。因此，许多加密货币领域的人士将该法案视为加密货币获得更广泛机构认可的垫脚石。</p><p>然而，银行提出了强烈的反对意见。他们提交了一份书面文件，其中包含严苛的禁止原则。这些原则主要针对利息和稳定币收益项目。银行认为，收益型稳定币对传统存款构成威胁。因此，他们希望禁止持有稳定币者进行任何形式的经济活动。他们还建议限制豁免范围，严惩违规者，并要求对存款外流的风险进行正式研究。</p><h2><strong>加密货币公司力求提高灵活性</strong></h2><p>加密货币领域的代表则反驳道，他们认为收益并非投机，而是链上效率的体现。此外，他们还警告说，禁止奖励会扼杀创新。Ripple 的首席法务官表示，目前正在形成某种妥协方案：交易相关的奖励可以被豁免。这一改变既能维持加密货币的功能，又不会与银行存款形成竞争。</p><p>白宫设定的最后期限改变了谈判的性质。时间压力迫使各方做出让步。如果未能达成协议，扩大加密货币市场改革的进程可能再次陷入停滞。这样的结果将推迟交易所、发行方和开发者全面受益。相反，达成某种妥协将带来人们渴望已久的监管保障。市场正在密切关注事态发展。</p><h2><strong>这对加密货币市场意味着什么</strong></h2><p>这场争议的影响远不止于稳定币本身，它还塑造着美国的加密货币政策。当立法者找到平衡点时，创新与合规便可并存。一旦谈判失败，分裂的局面将持续下去。无论如何，最终结果都将影响资本流动、稳定币的发展以及美国在数字金融领域的竞争力。</p></div></div>

白宫将《CLARITY法案》的最后期限定为3月1日

贝莱德亚太区iShares主管尼古拉斯·皮奇表示，即使在亚洲，对加密货币进行适度的投资组合配置也可能推动大量资金流入市场。

他在Consensus大会的一个小组讨论会上发表了上述言论……

贝莱德高管表示，亚洲地区1%的加密货币配置可释放2万亿美元的新资金流入。

全球最大的加密货币交易所币安继续保持着快速上线竞争币的步伐。
此时，币安宣布将上线名为 Espresso ($ESP) 的竞争币。
“币安将……”

币安宣布将上线一种令人惊喜的新竞争币！价格正在上涨！

2026 年投资者面临的问题已不是 「要不要配置」，而是「配多少，以及通过什么工具配置 」。