avatar
Ye Zhang 📜
15,114個推特粉絲
關注
Cofounder @Scroll_ZKP. Doing research about zero-knowledge proof, system, and hardware.
動態
avatar
Ye Zhang 📜
03-15
主題貼
For those who don’t know, this is my favorite feature in ChatGPT: You can branch the current conversation into a new chat while keeping the same context. My usual pattern is this: I’m learning something new, the answer introduces unfamiliar concepts, and I want to dig into those concepts more deeply. But doing that in the main chat can taint the original context. Branching solves that. I can explore those questions in a separate chat, then come back to the main conversation. However, I usually have too many follow-up questions, so it turns into branches of branches of branches, and it quickly becomes hard to manage. I think the best chat app for learning should have a tree structure. You could keep exploring new concepts on different branches, while still being able to manage everything and all context easily in a visual way. I’ve wanted to vibe-code something like this, but I’ve been too lazy + all my past context is already in ChatGPT + I’d rather use my subscription than build on the API. Still, I think this is a real need for power learners like me. Another need is having some separate thread monitor the conversations so it doesn’t go down a rabbit hole, because the user (me) is the only one steering the whole conversation...(similar to the problems mentioned in last tweet, I keep asking random distracted questions and need some "advisor" to stop me stuck in the same place with a global view). @sama @ChatGPTapp @JustinBleuel
STUCK
0%
avatar
Ye Zhang 📜
02-28
Today, Anthropic is big enough to say no. However, most people don’t really have “choice” unless they’re big enough to matter. Terms of service is basically a binary button: accept or leave. And if you need the service, “leave” isn’t realistic. If every major LLM collects your data by default, how many people can truly opt out? (Yes, privacy-preserving models exist. But if those modes are much weaker, they aren’t real alternatives. Many of those companies also die because they lack access to data as a flywheel. You have to survive long enough and be at the table to even talk about your values.) When intelligence and distribution concentrate in a few hands, companies don’t just build products. They set the rules. Everyone else adapts. This reminds me of that tweet a while ago: Gemini basically required activity collection to use it, or your AI would forget every conversation 👇
Ye Zhang
@yezhang1998
12-21
Gemini has gotten way better technically, but its privacy model is still a hard no for me. You're forced into this tradeoff: • Activity ON → Keep chat history, but chats can train Google's models • Activity OFF → No training use, but history deleted after 72 hours That's
ANTHROPIC
19.52%
avatar
Ye Zhang 📜
12-21
最近timeline很多人开始转向gemini 我这里来提个醒，我是没感觉gemini比claude+gpt好多少，并且发现它数据收集和隐私设置是我完全没法接受的 用gemini的话，你只能被迫选择 1. 全部关掉数据收集（那么你所有的chat记录只能保留72h） 2. 完全打开数据收集（那么你的chat会被用于google以后的训练） 其他任何一个大模型，Grok GPT Claude都是允许你保留对话数据，但是选择数据不被用于训练的，只有Google刻意没有这么做……我觉得这个实在是绑架的太厉害了，毕竟一个72h memory的chat box也没啥用…… Google会做的很好，它有gmail，drive，youtube，还有这么多chat的数据，会做的越来越好，但是想象一下哪一天你的很多信息直接成为了model pre-train的一些knowledge，这该是多么可怕的事情 而且大家都开始这么恶性竞争，都强制用户提交数据的话，实在是会让整个生态环境也变得越来越糟糕
Ye Zhang
@yezhang1998
12-21
Gemini has gotten way better technically, but its privacy model is still a hard no for me. You're forced into this tradeoff: • Activity ON → Keep chat history, but chats can train Google's models • Activity OFF → No training use, but history deleted after 72 hours That's
loading indicator
Loading..