It's quite interesting. When was at its lowest point, some people said had no hope, one of the evidence being: even the brushing bots were gone, truly no manipulation, truly a decentralized community. When was listed on bn/ok, they became very sour, questioning why the exchange didn't list their "community coin" that they participated in. Why didn't they list it? Are they not clear about it in their hearts? If your "community coin" is backed by a large amount of hoarded capital, would the exchange be serving them by listing it?

The exchange listing team is not stupid. Why can ACT and Pnut be listed, and can they keep rising after listing? Why do some of the "community coins" listed before keep falling after listing? A large number of controlled funds quickly pulled up to hundreds of millions or even 1 billion, which is indeed very fomo, but once listed, the chain has been dumped by the market makers. How can it rise? CEX has thought about this problem clearly a long time ago. There is no problem with the choice of ACT and Pnut, which is very wise.

Standing at the forefront, with new tracks and new narratives, the coins of real communities: act/pnut, can be listed on major exchanges so quickly. Becoming the logic of the secondary track and the choice of secondary funds, the upper limit can reach tens of billions of US dollars. Playing with strong on-chain coins is no problem, and it can also pull in hundreds of millions or even billions, but that is on-chain logic, not secondary logic, and it is difficult to be listed on major exchanges.