Is the popularity of Memecoins an inevitable phenomenon driven by market demand, or a speculative frenzy caused by a lack of regulation?

This article is machine translated
Show original

Original Title: "Memecoins - The Inevitable Path to Mainstream Adoption or the Symptom of a Broken System?"

Author: Jen Albert

Translated by: Bai Hua Blockchain

As the host of Blockchain Banter, I recently led a discussion on memecoins - a topic that has sparked intense debate across the industry. Whether you love them or hate them, their impact cannot be denied. Some believe they are destroying the crypto industry, while others see them as a natural evolution of the decentralized market.

To delve deeper into this debate, I invited Justin Havens (Polygon DeFi Ecosystem Growth Lead) and Dr. Mark Richardson (Bancor & Carbon DeFi Project Lead) to join the discussion. We explored the following core topics:

  • The origins of memecoins and their role
  • Regulatory challenges
  • Investor vs. gambler mentality
  • Influencers vs. Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs)
  • The possibilities and limitations of DYOR (Do Your Own Research)

This conversation revealed the multifaceted impact of memecoins in the crypto market. Join us as we explore this topic further!

1. The Memecoin Debate

Memecoins have sparked a significant divide in the crypto space. Some view them as an interesting and community-driven form of market participation, while others believe they undermine the industry's legitimacy. On one side, prominent figures like Benjamin Cowen have even stated that "memecoins are destroying the crypto industry."

On the other hand, we've also seen industry heavyweights take the opposite stance, such as CZ, the co-founder and former CEO of BNB, who seems to be encouraging (or perhaps not 😏) the creation of more memecoins by posting photos of his pet dog Broccoli with an entire page of backstory.

"I just posted a photo and name of my dog. I didn't issue a memecoin myself, whether to create one is up to the community (or not). However, I may interact with some of the more popular memecoins on the BNB Chain (BSC). The BNB Foundation may provide rewards for the top memecoins on the BNB Chain, such as LP support or other incentives. The details are still being discussed, so stay tuned."

Justin believes that memecoins are not a coincidence, but rather the inevitable result of regulatory crackdowns on structured Token issuances. Due to concerns about legal risks, project teams have been forced to choose from the following options:

  • Completely avoid any discussion of Token utility
  • Opt for private fundraising, excluding retail investors
  • Issue Tokens with no clear purpose

So, what happens when the only viable public Token issuance method is Tokens with no actual utility? The answer is the rise of memecoins.

Mark further points out: "The market incentives determine the ultimate outcome." Regulatory authorities have created an environment where Tokens with utility fall into legal gray areas, while Tokens that explicitly claim to have "no utility" face almost no compliance risks. The result is the rapid dominance of memecoins.

2. Investors or Gamblers? The Subtle Line in the Crypto Market

One of the biggest misconceptions in the crypto space is the belief that there is a clear line between investing and gambling. But does this line truly exist?

Investors research fundamentals, assess risks, and make decisions with a long-term perspective.

Gamblers chase hype, trade impulsively, and accept extreme risks.

Justin points out that many retail traders are forced into a "gambling mentality" because they are unable to participate in traditional early-stage investments. Unless you are an accredited investor, your only choice is speculative trading - which includes memecoins.

Mark believes that the line is much more blurred than most people imagine. After all, some of the best-performing crypto assets in history have been blatant scams. As he puts it:

"People will tell you not to invest in this, that it's a scam. And others will say, 'I know it is.'"

It is this paradox that fuels the frenzy around memecoins - the projects that appear most like scams sometimes end up delivering the biggest returns.

3. Do KOLs Fuel the Memecoin Mania?

The discussion naturally turned to KOLs (Key Opinion Leaders) and paid influencers - key drivers in the memecoin ecosystem. So, is the root of the problem the memecoins themselves, or the people who promote them for profit?

  • In fact, there is a fundamental difference between true KOLs and paid influencers:
  • True KOLs are respected industry builders and experts.
  • Paid influencers often promote Tokens they've been hired to advertise, creating a false impression of organic market interest.

This also explains the other side of the memecoin hype - is it the market demand that creates them, or the artificial amplification?

4. Has the Term "KOL" Been Overused in Crypto?

Mark believes the term "KOL" is often misused in the crypto space. Many so-called "opinion leaders" are essentially just advertisers selling Token allocations behind the scenes. If a project needs to pay people to talk about it, it's worth asking: why does it need to do that?

The core question is about incentive structures. If someone is aggressively promoting a Token, ask yourself - what are they getting out of it?

5. DYOR: Is It Really Feasible?

The phrase "Do Your Own Research (DYOR)" is repeatedly emphasized in the crypto world, but the reality is often more complex than the slogan. As audience member Mike pointed out, DYOR is easier said than done.

Most people lack both the tools and the expertise to properly analyze:

  • Token distribution
  • Potential risks in smart contracts
  • Liquidity structures and other key factors

While true on-chain analysis does require some investment, there are tools like Bubble Maps that can provide visual insights into Token distribution and potential scams. But ultimately, if you don't understand what you're buying, you're more like a gambler than an investor.

6. Can Memecoins Evolve? The Case of Sei

There was a counterpoint raised in the discussion: some memecoins, although initially just a joke, have later developed into real projects.

Seiyan (a memecoin on the Sei chain) is a typical example - it started as a memecoin but later launched its own aggregator, channeling the community's momentum into a more tangible product.

The line between memecoins and utility Tokens is not always clear-cut. Sometimes, memecoins can grow into genuine projects, contributing to the ecosystem far beyond being a "fun Token."

7. Conclusion: Memecoins Are Here to Stay

Memecoins remain one of the most controversial topics in the crypto industry, and this discussion is far from over.

But one thing is certain - memecoins have become a part of the market, and they are not going away anytime soon. Their demand is market-driven, and until regulations are clear and can support structured Token issuances, memecoins may continue to dominate.

So, what is the root of the problem?

Is it the memecoins themselves?

Is it the speculative mentality of KOLs and the market?

Or is it the imperfect regulatory system?

As Justin summarized:

"If you fix the incentive structures, you can fix the market."

Source
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion which does not represent any position of Followin, and is not intended as, and shall not be understood or construed as, investment advice from Followin.
Like
Add to Favorites
Comments
Followin logo